期刊文献+

大型工程全寿命期生态成本研究综述 被引量:6

Research Framework on Life-Cycle Ecological Cost of Large-Scale Project
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 大型工程建设对区域社会、环境、经济造成长期影响,关系到区域的可持续发展。从项目评价研究来看,环境评价实际上已经独立成为一个体系,而社会评价仅停留在定性层面,因此需要研究以全寿命期成本为核心的项目评价。项目生态成本包括社会成本、环境成本和工程成本,需要厘清三者的边界。现行的工程成本来自货币化的相对体系,不能解决资源的绝对价值的度量问题,因此资源绝对价值度量的量化模型亟待研究。基于系统生态学的能值分析能够计算生态系统的物质流动和能量传递,并直接把资源价值转化为太阳能值质量(Emergy)。 Large-scale project construction impacts on regional society, economy and environment for a long period.It also relates to the sustainable development. That appears the project evaluation has the essential obstinate disease. In view of project evaluation, environmental evaluation has already become a independent system in practice, as well as the social evaluation stopped on the qualitative level. Thus the project evaluation is needed taking life-cycle cost as the core. In fact, the economic evaluation of project includes social cost, environmental cost, and social cost. The research scope of large-scale project cost should be expurgated on the boundaries, especially between the environment and society cost. The existing engineering cost come from the financial system, it can not control the measurement of resource absolute value. Moreover, the absolute value measurement of resource needs to study quantitative model right now. The Energy analysis based on systematic ecology could calculate the material flowing and energy transferring of ecological system. The method can apply to any kind and level ecological energy system including economic-social system. It is very significant on theory and practice that it extends the applied fields of ecology, enriches construction project management theory and assists to the project evaluation and investment decision.
作者 周红
出处 《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第21期43-46,共4页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
关键词 大型工程 全寿命期 生态成本 综述 Large-Scale Project Total Life Cycle Ecological Model Life-Cycle Cost Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

  • 1王朝纲,李开孟.投资项目社会评价专题讲座(十二)——第七讲 项目社会评价与其他评价的联系与区别[J].中国工程咨询,2004(12):42-44. 被引量:3
  • 2[1]CAMPBELL B,HUMPHREY T F.Methods of Cost Effectiveness Analysis for Highway Projects[C].Washington,DC:Transportation Research Board,National Research Council,1998.
  • 3[2]HERBERSMAN Z,ELLIS R.Multiparameter bidding system-innovation in contract construction adimination[J].Journal of Construction and Management,1992,118(1):142-150.
  • 4[3]HERBSMAN Z J.A+B bidding method-hidden success story for highway construction[J].Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,1995,121 (4):430-437.
  • 5[4]SORENSON J,TERRY E,MATHIS D.Maintaining the Customer-Drivenhighway[J].PublicRoads,1998,62(3):489-495.
  • 6[5]ALLOUCHE E N,ARIARATNAM S T,ABOURIZK S M.Mult-Dimensional Utility Model for Selection of a Trenchiless Construction Method[C].ProceedingsConstruction Congress Ⅵ,2000(11):543-553.
  • 7[6]ANDREW GILCHRIST,EREZ N.Allouche.Quantification of social costs associated with construction projects:state-of-the-art review[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Techonology,2005(20):89-104.
  • 8[7]WATKINS L H.Some research into the environment impact of roads and traffic,transport research for social and ecomomic process[C].Proceedings of World Conference on Transport Research,1980.
  • 9[8]THALHEIMER E.Construction noise control program and mitigation strategy at the central artery/tunnel project[J].Noise Control Engineering Journal,2000(5):157-165.
  • 10[9]DELUCHI M A.The social cost of motor vehicle use[J].The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,1997:553.

共引文献17

同被引文献48

引证文献6

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部