期刊文献+

抗精神病药物对精神分裂症患者生活质量影响的1年随访研究 被引量:11

Effect of antipsychotic drugs on life quality of schizophrenic patients:one year follow-up study
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:比较氯丙嗪、舒必利、氯氮平、利培酮、奥氮平、喹硫平、阿立哌唑等7种抗精神病药物长期服用对精神分裂症患者生活质量的影响。方法:对1 227例病程小于5年服用7种药物之一作为维持治疗的精神分裂症患者进行为期1年的随访,在基线、随访12个月进行健康状况调查问卷(SF-36)评定。结果:与基线相比,7组药物1年末生活质量都有很大的提高。不同药物对躯体疼痛、精力和精神健康因子的改善存在显著差异(P<0.05),以奥氮平和喹硫平对生活质量的改善最为明显。结论:长期服用抗精神病药物能不断提高精神分裂症患者的生活质量。非典型抗精神病药物,尤其是奥氮平和喹硫平,对生活质量的改善要优于传统抗精神病药物。 Objective To compare the effect of 7 antipsychotic drugs on the life quality of schizophrenia patients including chlorpromazine, sulpiride, clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole. Methods A total of 1 227 stable schizophrenic patients within 5 years onset who took 1 of the 7 study medications as maintenance treatment were followed up for 1 year at 10 China sites. Patients were evaluated by the short form-36 health survey (SF-36) at the baseline and at the end of 1 year. Results The life quality was improved obviously at the end of the follow-up. There was significant difference in body pain, vitality, and mental health ( P 〈 0.05 ) among these antipsychotic drugs. Conclusion All 7 antipsychotic drugs can improve the life quality of schizophrenia patients. Atypical antipsychotic drugs, especially olazapine and quetiapine, are superior to typical antipsychotic drugs in improving life quality.
出处 《中南大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第9期850-855,共6页 Journal of Central South University :Medical Science
基金 "十五"国家科技攻关计划项目(2004BA720A22)~~
关键词 精神分裂症 抗精神病药物 生活质量 SF-36 schizophrenia antipsychotic drugs life quality SF-36
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Rosenheck R A, Stroup S, Keefe R, et al. Measuring outcome priorities and incorporating preferences in mental health status assessment of people with schizophrenia [ J ] . Br J Psychiatry, 2005,187:529-536.
  • 2Lambert M, Naber D. Current issues in schizophrenia : overview of patient acceptability, functioning and quality of life [J]. CNS Drugs, 2004, 18(suppl 2) :5-17.
  • 3Karow A, Naber D. Subjective well-being and quality of life under antipsychotic treatment [ J ]. Psychopharmacology, 2002, 162(1) :3-10.
  • 4Jones P B, Barnes T R, Davies L, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effect on quality of life of second- vs firstgeneration antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: cost utility of the latest antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia study (CUtLASS 1 ) [ J]. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2006,63 (10) : 1079-1087.
  • 5Awad A G, Voruganti L N P. Impact of atypical antipsychotics on quality of life in patients with schizophrenia [ J ]. CNS Drugs, 2004,18(13) :877-893.
  • 6Rosenheck R, Cramer J, Xu W, et al. A comparison of elozapine and haloperidol in hospitalized patients with refractory schizophrenia[J]. N Engl J Med, 1997, 337(12) :809-815.
  • 7Ware J E, Sherboume C D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) : Conceptual framework and item selection[J]. Medical Care, 1992,30(6) :473-483.
  • 8盛承东,王祖承,李春波,方华.健康状况调查问卷应用于精神分裂症患者中的信度和效度[J].上海精神医学,2002,14(3):151-153. 被引量:50
  • 9American Psychiatric Association. Diagnositc and statistical manual of mental disorders [ M ]//DSM-Ⅳ. 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA,1994.
  • 10Kay S R, Fiszbein A, Opler L A. The positive and negative syndrome scale ( PANSS ) for schizophrenia [ J ] . Schizophr Bull, 1987,13(2) :261-267.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-from health survery (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 1992, 30: 473
  • 2范肖冬.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版).北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999,77
  • 3Wang XS, Cleeland CS, Mendoza TR, et al. The effects of pain severity on health-related quality of life.: a study of Chinese cancer patients. Cancer, 1999, 86(9) : 1848
  • 4Ren XS, Chang K. Evaluating health status of elderly Chinese in Boston. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998, 51(5) : 429
  • 5Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB, et al. Validating the SF-36Health Survery Questionnaire: New outcome measure for primary care. British Medical Journal, 1992, 305: 160
  • 6Ware JE. Health status and outcomes assessment tool. The Intenation Electronic Journal of Health Education, 2000, 3 : 138
  • 7刘朝杰,李宁秀,任晓晖,李俊,张骏,孙丁.36条目简明量表在中国人群中的适用性研究[J].华西医科大学学报,2001,32(1):39-42. 被引量:319
  • 8刘红波,姜又红,刘延龄.SF-36健康调查问卷应用于社区老年人的信度和效度评价[J].中国行为医学科学,2001,10(3):244-246. 被引量:76
  • 9张骏,何廷尉,罗德儒,刘朝杰,陈芙君,袁鸿江.SF-36评价中风患者生命质量的信度和效度[J].中国行为医学科学,2001,10(5):416-419. 被引量:62
  • 10李春波,何燕玲.健康状况调查问卷SF-36的介绍[J].国外医学(精神病学分册),2002,29(2):116-119. 被引量:609

共引文献49

同被引文献104

引证文献11

二级引证文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部