期刊文献+

硬-腰联合麻醉用于剖宫产术中的观察 被引量:1

Effect of combined spinal epidural anesthesia in cesarean section
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:比较硬-腰联合麻醉(CSEA)与硬膜外阻滞麻醉(EA)在剖宫产术中应用的效果。方法:健康足月妊娠孕妇120例,年龄23~37岁,随机分为CSEA组(60例)和EA组(60例),比较两种麻醉方法的麻醉效果。结果:CSEA组镇痛效果、肌肉松弛满意率均优于EA组,阻滞平面达T_6的时间、麻醉诱导至胎儿娩出时间、手术至胎儿娩出时间均短于EA组(P<0.05),新生儿1 min的Apgar评分两组间无差异,但低血压发生率高于EA组(P<0.05)。结论:CSEA用于剖宫产术起效快、阻滞完善,但要防治低血压的发生。 Objective: To compare the effect of combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) with that of epidural anesthesia (EA) in cesarean section. Method: One hundred and twenty healthy mature pregnant women were randomly assigned to CSEA group (n=60) and EA group (n =60 ), 23-37 years old, to compare the effect of combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) with that of epidural anesthesia (EA). Results: The durations from anesthetic induction to delivery were shorter in CSEA group than in EA group (P 〈0.05). The effects of analgesia and muscular relaxation were better in CSEA group than in EA group. But the incidence of hypotension was higher in CSEA group than in EA group (P 〈0.05). There was no difference at neonate 1 minute Apgar score between two groups. Conclusion: The effect of CSEA in cesarean section is better than that of EA, but hypotension should be prevented in CSEA.
作者 吴艳 张希
出处 《新疆医科大学学报》 CAS 2009年第9期1321-1322,共2页 Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
关键词 硬-腰联合麻醉 硬膜外麻醉 剖宫产术 combined spinal epidural anesthesia epidural anesthesia cesarean section
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献3

  • 1余爱珍.基础护理学[M].南京:江苏科技出版社,1990.139.
  • 2谢英.麻醉学[M].北京:科学技术出版社,1994.350.
  • 3谢荣 谭惠英 等.临床麻醉学[M].北京:中国医学医药科技出版社,1992.110.

共引文献12

同被引文献8

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部