期刊文献+

硬-腰联合麻醉用于新式剖宫产术中的观察 被引量:6

Effect of combined spinal epidural analgesia in Misgav Ladach cesarean section
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 :比较硬 腰联合麻醉 (CSEA)与硬膜外阻滞麻醉 (EA)在新式剖宫产术中应用的效果。方法 :健康足月妊娠产妇2 0 89例 ,随机分为EA组 (1193例 )和CSEA组 (896例 ) ,比较两种麻醉方法的麻醉效果。结果 :CSEA组阻滞平面达T6 的时间、麻醉诱导至胎儿娩出时间、手术至胎儿娩出时间均短于EA组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,镇痛效果、肌肉松弛满意率均优于EA组 ,但低血压发生率高于EA组 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论 :CSEA用于新式剖宫产术起效快、阻滞完善 。 Objective To compare the effect of combined spinal epidural analgesia(CSEA)with that of epidural analgesia(EA) in Misgav Ladach cesarean section.Method 2-098 healthy mature pregnant women were randomly assigned to CSEA group(n=1-193)and EA group(n=896). Results The durations from anesthetic induction to delivery were shorter in CSEA group than in EA group(P<0.05). The effects of analgesia and muscular relaxation were better in CSEA group than in EA group. But the incidence of hypotension was higher in CSEA group than in EA group(P<0.05).Conclusion The effect of CSEA in Misgav Ladach cesarean section is better than that of EA, but hypotension should be prevented in CSEA.
出处 《东南大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2003年第6期396-398,共3页 Journal of Southeast University(Medical Science Edition)
关键词 硬—腰联合麻醉 新式剖宫产 硬膜外阻滞麻醉 足月妊娠 低血压 镇痛 combined spinal epidural analgesia epidural analgesia cesarean section
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1王俊科 王多友.临床麻醉手册(第5版)[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1999,8..
  • 2谢荣 谭惠英 等.临床麻醉学[M].北京:中国医学医药科技出版社,1992.110.
  • 3陈华,苏妮塔,崔健君.腰-硬联合阻滞和硬膜外阻滞对母婴影响的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2002,18(8):436-438. 被引量:58
  • 4魏涧琦.关于脊麻的若干近代观点[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2002,23(2):94-96. 被引量:24
  • 5王俊科 译.临床麻醉手册[M]:第5版[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1999.193.
  • 6谢荣 谭惠英 李德馨.临床麻醉学[M].北京:中国医学医药科技出版社,1992.110.
  • 7马彦彦.新式剖宫产[M].北京:北京科学技术出版社,1997.45.
  • 8李忠田,王学斌,杨学锋.腰-硬联合阻滞穿刺中无脑脊液流出的原因分析[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2002,18(5):268-268. 被引量:9
  • 9ROUT C C, ROCKED A, LEVIN J, et al. A reevaluation of the role of crystalloid preload in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section[ J ]. Anesthesiology, 1993,79 (2) : 262-269.
  • 10MATSUKAWA T, SESSLER D I, CHRISWENSEN R, et al.Heat flow and distribution during epidural anesthesia[J]. Anesthesiology, 1995,83(5) :961-967.

二级参考文献2

共引文献137

同被引文献26

  • 1赵宏,崔健君.剖宫产术中子宫切开至胎儿娩出间隔对新生儿的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志,1993,28(2):67-69. 被引量:148
  • 2张绍杰,王育明.腰硬联合穿刺用于产科手术麻醉的体会[J].武警医学,2005,16(2):147-147. 被引量:5
  • 3曲慧延,陈月秀.238例二次剖宫产手术情况分析[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2006,27(2):67-69. 被引量:18
  • 4张野.复合腰麻硬膜外麻醉[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),1996,17(4):210-212. 被引量:271
  • 5Gadsden J,Hart S,Santos AC.Post-cesarean delivery analgesia[J].Anesth Analg,2005,101:62.
  • 6Verccauteren M,Vereechen K,La Malfa M,et al.Costeffectiveness of analgesia after caesarean section:a comparison of intrathecal morphine and epidural PCA[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2002,46:85.
  • 7Cohen S,Lowenwirt I,Pantuck CB,et al.Bupivacaine 0.01% and/or epinephrine 0.5mcg/mL improve epidural fentanyl analgesia after cesarean section[J].Anesthesiology,1998,89:1354.
  • 8Jeff Gadsden, Sturt Hart,Alan C Santos. Post-Cesarean Delivery Analgesia[J]. Anesth Analg,2005,101 (5) :62 - 69.
  • 9Flisberg p,Rudin A, Linner R,Lundberg CJ. Pain relief and safety after major surgery a prospective study of epidural and intravenous analgesia in 2696 patients[J ]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2003,47 (4):457-465.
  • 10Verccauteren M,Vereechen K, La Malfa M, et al. Cost-erffective- hess of analgesia after Caesarean section : a comparison of intrathecal morphine and epidural PCA[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2002,46 (1):85-89.

引证文献6

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部