期刊文献+

期望最大化法和回归法对亚洲心血管病国际合作研究缺失数据填充效果比较 被引量:15

Comparison of Expectation-maximization Method and Regression Method in Dealing with Missing Data of the International Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease in ASIA
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析亚洲心血管病国际合作研究(international collaborative study of cardiovascular disease in ASIA,InterASIA)缺失值缺失机制,探索适合该资料的方便、有效、合理的填充方法。方法利用SPSS16.0软件,分析数据的缺失机制,分别采用期望最大化法和回归法对缺失数据进行填充。结果InterASIA资料缺失指标缺失率在0.1%~2.1%,缺失机制为随机缺失,年龄偏小的人指标缺失率更高;采用期望最大化法和回归法对缺失数据进行填充后各指标的算术均数、标准差以及线性回归模型中的回归系数及标准误与填充前各指标的取值非常接近。结论InterASIA资料缺失率低,其缺失机制为随机缺失,期望最大化法和回归法是方便、有效、合理的填充方法。 Objective To explore the corrected application of the structural equation model in the study of the relationship between personality and mental health among the medical college students. Methods The surveys were completed by 448 medical col/ege students by using SCL - 90 and Revised NEO Personality Inventory ( NEO - PI - R). Exploratory factor analysis and structural equation model were used to analyze the relationship between personality and mental health. Results All of path coefficients, load coefficients and other parameters are statistically significant. Conclusion Certain criteria and applied conditions should be followed when structural equation model is applied, and it provides a theoretical basis and specialized conclusion for the research.
出处 《中国卫生统计》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期367-369,373,共4页 Chinese Journal of Health Statistics
关键词 缺失值 随机缺失 期望最大化法 回归法 Structural equation model Personality Mental health
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Demissie S, Lavalley MP, Horton NJ, et al. Bias due to missing exposure data using complete-case analysis in the proportional hazards regression model. Stat Med,2003,22(4) :545-557.
  • 2Barzi F, Woodward M. Imputations of missing values in practice: results from imputations of serum cholesterol in 28 cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol,2004,160( 1 ) :34-45.
  • 3任金马,赵杨,陈峰,蓝绍颖.配比设计中缺失数据的hot-deck估算[J].中国卫生统计,2004,21(5):303-306. 被引量:5
  • 4Hu D,Xie J,Fu P,et al. Central rather than overall obesity is related to diabetes in the Chinese population : the InterASIA study. Obesity ( Silver Spring) ,2007,15 ( 11 ) : 2809-2816.
  • 5武建虎,贺佳,贺宪民,程红岩.多变量缺失数据的不同处理方法及分析结果比较[J].第二军医大学学报,2004,25(9):1013-1016. 被引量:19
  • 6Shrive FM,Stuart H,Quan H,et al. Dealing with missing data in a multiquestion depression scale: a comparison of imputation methods. BMC Med Res Methodol.2006 .6 :57-66.
  • 7虞慧婷,吴骋,柳伟伟,贺佳.基于贝叶斯网络的原发性肝癌预后影响因素相互关系研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(1):10-14. 被引量:2

二级参考文献21

  • 1陆敏强,陈规划,杨扬,蔡常洁,何晓顺,朱晓峰.中国原发性肝癌临床分期预测肝癌肝移植预后的临床研究[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2005,11(4):224-226. 被引量:4
  • 2曲强,芮静安,王少斌,陈曙光,周立,韩凯,魏学,张宁,赵海涛,程恩成.肝细胞肝癌临床分期系统的比较[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(2):155-158. 被引量:10
  • 3武建虎,贺佳,贺宪民,张智坚,马修强,吴骋.关联规则及其在肝癌病人资料分析中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2006,23(1):34-38. 被引量:15
  • 4[1]Scheffe J. Dealing with missing data[J]. Res Lett Inf Math Sci,2002,3:153-156.
  • 5[3]Schafer JL, Olsen MK. Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: a data analyst's perspective[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research,1998,33(4): 545-571.
  • 6[5]Darmawan I GN. NORM software review: handling missing values with multiple imputation methods[J]. Evaluat J Australastia, 2002,2(1): 51-57
  • 7[6]Bernards CA, Farmer MM, Qi K, et al. Comparison of two multiple imputation procedures in a cancer screening survey [J]. J Data Sci, 2003,1(1): 1-20.
  • 8[2]NCES Statistical Standards. 2002:131-132. http://www. nces. ed. gov.
  • 9[3]Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons. Inc. 2000.
  • 10[4]Mander A, Clayton D. Hot Deck Imputation(2001). http://www.stata. com/stb/stb54, 2001.

共引文献23

同被引文献109

引证文献15

二级引证文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部