摘要
目的:对BV唾液酸酶法诊断细菌性阴道病进行方法学评价,同时分析BV合并霉菌滴虫感染情况。方法:取阴道分泌物216份标本,分别用BV唾液酸酶快速诊断法、传统Amsel标准参考方法检测、阴道分泌物悬液镜检进行检测。结果:BV唾液酸酶检测的阳性率与Amsel标准参考方法比较无统计学差异(P>0.05),其灵敏性(93.9%)、特异度(97.4%)、正确指数(0.913)均较高;BV合并滴虫感染的患者明显高于单纯滴虫感染患者,两者比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。结论:BV唾液酸酶检测方法与Amsel标准参考方法比较,既准确又简便,值得在妇产科及门诊推广。
Objective： To evaluate on the methodology of BV sialic acid enzymatic diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, and analyze the infection of BV combined with Trichomonas sp. Methods： 216 vaginal discharge samples were analyzed with BV rapid diagnostic method, the traditional methods of detection of standard reference Amsel, and vaginal secretions suspension test examination. Results： no significant difference was found between BV sialidase-positive rate and standard reference methods Amsel BV sialidase-positive rate and standard reference methods Amsel （P 〉 0.05）; sensitivity （93.9%）, specificity （97.4%）, the right index （0.913） of the former are higher; patients BV merged with Trichomonas infection was significantly more than that in patients with trichomonas infection only （P 〈0.01）. Conclusion： Compared with standard reference methods, BV sialidase Amsel detection methods are reliable and simple, worthy of promotion in obstetrics and gynecology, and out-patient.
出处
《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》
2009年第4期13-14,共2页
Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
