期刊文献+

国内Barthel指数和改良Barthel指数应用的回顾性研究 被引量:528

Review of the application of Barthel Index and Modified Barthel Index in China's Mainland
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:系统回顾分析国内Barthel指数(BI)和改良Barthel指数(MBI)的发展及使用情况,以利于今后量表的规范化使用。方法:通过系统回顾的方法对1979年以来有关BI与MBI的文献和书籍进行系统分析。结果:有关BI的文献723篇,其中,73.12%—84.39%作为判断康复疗效的指标,而针对其本身研究的文献仅发现1篇。在入选的29篇MBI文献中,66.67%—73.12%的文章显示MBI作为疗效的判断,但没有发现针对量表本身的研究。同时,涉及MBI的专业书籍中85%错误认为BI就是MBI。结论:BI和MBI是日常生活活动(ADL)评定及疗效判定的重要指标,但在国内使用中缺乏针对性的研究,使用混乱,甚至错误地将BI认为是MBI。因此,正确区分BI和MBI及规范化其使用方法是很有必要的。 Objective: To study the application of Barthel Index (BI) and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) in China's Mainland and correct the mistake. Method: Review the journal articles, books and other articles from 1979 to 2008. Result: BI was used as an outcome measurement tool in 73.12%--84.39% of 723 articles. While MBI was used as a therapeutic effect index in 66.67%--73.12% of 29 articles. On the other hand, only one article involved the study of BI itself. But none of the articles tried to study MBI. In twenty books there were seven books introduced MBI, but most of the books (85.71%) did not introduce MBI tightly. Conclusion: BI and MBI were widely used in activities of daily living (ADL) evaluation and theraputic effect measurement, but there is lack of comparative on BI and MBI in China's Mainland. Someone even regarded BI as MBI. So to differentiate and apply BI and MBI correctly are needed urgently.
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第8期737-740,共4页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 康复评定 BARTHEL指数 改良BARTHEL指数 rehabilitation evaluation Barthel index modified barthel index
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1汪家琮主编.日常生活与环境改造[M].北京:华夏出版社,2005.25-26.
  • 2蔡业峰,贾真,李伟峰,文龙龙,张燕婷,郭建文,欧爱华,梁伟雄,裴建,黄燕,黄培新.中文版Barthel指数对多中心测评缺血性卒中患者预后的研究[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2007,4(11):486-490. 被引量:207
  • 3Mahoney FI. Barthel D. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index[J]. Maryland State Medical Journal, 1965,14:56--61.
  • 4Collin C. Wade DT. Davies S,et al. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study [J]. International Disability Studies, 1988,10(2): 61 --63.
  • 5Murdock C. A critical evaluation of the Barthel Index . Part 1 [J]. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1992,55 (3), 109--111.
  • 6Murdock C. A critical evaluation of the Barthel Index. Part 2 [J]. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1992,55 (3), 153--156.
  • 7Shah S, Cooper B. Commentary on "A critical evaluation of the Barthel Index" [J]. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1993,56(2): 70-72.
  • 8Formiga F, Masearo J, Pujol R. Inter-rater reliability of the BartheI Index[J]. Age and Ageing, 2005 34:655--657.
  • 9Shah S. Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation [J]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989, 42(8): 703-709.
  • 10Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Predicting Discharge Status at Commencement of Stroke Rehabilitation [J]. Stroke, 1989, 20:766--769.

二级参考文献11

  • 1老膺荣,郭新峰,赖世隆,梁伟雄,温泽淮,王奇,黄培新,黄燕.不同维度多个量表对脑卒中恢复期评价的比较[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(29):4-7. 被引量:8
  • 2各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33093
  • 3[1]Duncan PW,Jorgensen HS,Wade DT.Outcome measures in acute stroke trails:a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice[J].Stroke,2000,31:1429-1438.
  • 4[4]Bamford J,Dennis M,Sandercock P,et al.The frequency,causes and timing of death within 30 days of acute stroke:the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP)[J].J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,1990,53:824 -829.
  • 5[6]郭爱华.实用医学调查分析技术[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2005:276-277.
  • 6[7]Mahoney FI,Barthel DW.Functional evaluation:the Barthel Index[J].Md State Med J,1965,14:61-65.
  • 7[8]Cohen ME,Marino RJ.The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2000,81(Suppl 2):21-29.
  • 8[9]Kasner SE.Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales[J].Lancet Neurol,2006,5:603-612.
  • 9[10]Dromerick AW,Edwards DF,Diringer MN.Sensitivity to changes in disability after stroke:a comparison of four scales useful in clinical trials[J].J Rehabil Res Dev,2003,40:1-8.
  • 10[11]Sulter G,Steen C,De Keyser J.Use of the Barthel index and modified Rankin scale in acute stroke trials[J].Stroke,1999,30:1538-1541.

共引文献219

同被引文献4910

引证文献528

二级引证文献5820

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部