期刊文献+

DPPH法研究不同品种甘薯抗性淀粉抗氧化性 被引量:23

Study on antioxidant activity of resistant starch of different sweet potatoes by DPPH method
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 该实验采取DPPH方法研究不同品种甘薯抗性淀粉在浓度、温度、离子等因素影响下抗氧化性。结果表明:不同品种甘薯抗性淀粉抗氧化性具有明显差别,在最佳浓度条件下,苏薯八号、日本黄薯、京薯六号、香蕉薯、金海二号、水果薯、美国黑薯、德国黑薯、花心薯抗性淀粉对DPPH自由基抑制率分别为:84.0%、91.4%、83.7%、78.1%、78.3%、78.3%、83.7%、98.2%、68.2%;在最佳温度条件下,苏薯八号、日本黄薯、京薯六号、香蕉薯、金海二号、水果薯、美国黑薯、德国黑薯、花心薯抗性淀粉对DPPH自由基抑制率分别为:62.3%、63.9%、58.8%、62.6%、67.7%、69.0%、79.1%、75.2%、60.6%;与Vc抗氧化性比较,德国黑薯抗氧化性最强,为Vc1.03倍。 Abstract: The antioxidation property of resistant starch in different conditions temperature concentration and ion were studied in this paper by DPPH method. The results showed that there are certain difference for different sweet potatoes, on the optimum concentration condition, the DPPH radical scavenging activity of Su potato VIII, Japanese yellow potato, Jing VI potato, banana potato, golden sea II, fruit potato, American black potato, Germany black potato, umbilicus coloured potato: 84.0%, 91.4%, 83.7%, 78.1%, 78.3%, 78.3%, 83.7%, 98.2%, 68.2% respectively; on the optimum temperature condition, the DPPH radical scavenging activity of Su potato VIII, Japanese yellow potato, Jing VI potato, banana potato, golden sea II, fruit potato, American black potato, Germany black potato, umbilicus coloured potato: 62.3%, 63.9%, 58.8% ,62.6% ,67.7%,69.0% ,79.1% ,75.2% ,60.6% respectively. The highest antioxidant ability was Germany black potato, its DPPH" radical scavenging activity was 1.03 fold of Vc.
机构地区 天津商业大学
出处 《粮食与油脂》 北大核心 2009年第6期26-28,共3页 Cereals & Oils
关键词 甘薯 抗性淀粉 抗氧化性 sweet potato resistant starch antioxidant activity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1赵小明,杜琨,王宪伟.甘薯的营养价值及开发利用[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(4):751-751. 被引量:33
  • 2郭小丁,谢一芝,尹晴红.甘薯种质资源的创新与利用[J].中国蔬菜,2006(B10):81-83. 被引量:11
  • 3Hedemaun M S,Bach Knudsen K E.Resistant starch for weaning pigs-effect on concentration of short chain fatty acids in digesta and intestinal morphology[J].Livestock Science,2007,108:175-177.
  • 4Conway P L.Prebiotics and human health:the state-of the-art and future perspectives[J].Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition,2001,45:13-21.
  • 5Hylla S,Gostner A,Dnsel.G,et al.Effects ofresistant starch on the colon in healthy volunteers:possible implications for cancer prevention[J].American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,1998,67.136-142.
  • 6Brouns F,Kettlitz B,Arrigoni Eva.Resistant starch and the'bntyrate revolution'[J].Trends in Food Science & Technology,2002,13:251-261.
  • 7De Schrijver R,VanhoofK,Vande Ginste J.Nutrient utilization in rats and pigs fed enzyme resistant[J] Starch.Nutrition Research,1999,19 (9):1349-1361.
  • 8Saguila'n A A,Yago-Ayerdi S S,Vargas-Torres A,et al.Slowly digestible cookies prepared from resistant starch-rich linmerized banana starch[J],Journal of Food Composition and Analysis,2007,20:175-181.
  • 9Kim W K,Chung M K,Kang N E,et al.Effect of resistant starch from corn or rice on glucose control,colonic events,and blood lipid concentrations in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats[J].Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry,2003,14:166-172.
  • 10Martinez-Puig D,Mourot J,Ferchaud-Roucher V,et al.Consumption of resistant starch decreases lipogenesis in adipose tissues but not in muscular tissues of growing pigs[J].Livestock Science,2006,99:237-247.

二级参考文献13

  • 1郑仕宏,李忠海,黄亮.红薯果脯加工新方法[J].经济林研究,2004,22(2):44-46. 被引量:1
  • 2刘庆昌,翟红,王玉萍,等.甘薯细胞工程与分子育种研究进展.马代夫,刘庆昌主编.中国甘薯育种与产业化,北京:中国农业大学出版社,2005.147~159.
  • 3Cipriani G, Fuentes S, Bello V, et al. Transgene expression of rice cysteine proteinase inhibitors for the development of resistant against sweetpotato feathery mottle virus. CIP Program Report, 1999-2000,International Potato Center,2001, Lima Peru. 267-271
  • 4Okada Y, Saito A, Nishiguchi M, et al. Virus resistance in transgenic sweetpotato[ lpomoea batatas (L.)Lam.] expressing the coat protein gene of sweetpotato feathery mottle virus. Theor Appl Genet, 2001,103 (5) :743-751
  • 5Kimura T, Otani M, Noda T, et al. Absence of amylase in sweetpotato [ lpomoea batatas ( L. ) Lam.] following the introduction of granulebound starch synthase I cDNA. Plant Cell Report ,2001,20:663-666.
  • 6Gama M C S, Leite J R, Cordeiro A R, et al. Transgenic sweetpotato plants obtained by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult, 1996,46:237-244
  • 7Guo Xiaoding, Zhang Yungang. New use of sweetpotato germplasm.In : Proceedings of the International Workshop on Production, Utilization and Development of Sweetpotato. National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, Muan, Jeollanam-do,Korea. 2004. 118-125
  • 8刘庆昌,米凯霞,周海鹰,马彪,翟红.甘薯和Ipomoea lacunosa的种间体细胞杂种植株再生及鉴定[J].作物学报,1998,24(5):529-535. 被引量:14
  • 9张冰玉,刘庆昌,翟红,周海鹰.甘薯及其近缘野生种种间体细胞杂种植株的有效再生[J].中国农业科学,1999,32(6):23-27. 被引量:15
  • 10王玉萍,刘庆昌,李爱贤,翟红,森下敏和,洪重健.慢照射与茎尖培养相结合筛选甘薯同质突变体[J].作物学报,2002,28(1):18-23. 被引量:17

共引文献35

同被引文献323

引证文献23

二级引证文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部