期刊文献+

水模体吸收剂量校准因子的比较 被引量:3

Comparing of Calibration Factors in Term of Absorbed Dose to Water for Three Ion Chambers
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)TG-51协议和国际原子能结构(IAEA)TRS-398报告分别提出基于水模体吸收剂量校准因子N60CoD,w及ND,w,Q0的吸收剂量测定规程,而我国至今没有相应的测定规程。计算三种常用进口指形电离室的N60CoD,w/NX和ND,w,Q0/NX值,分别为CapintecPR-06C、NE2571及PTW30001,以便用国家计量实验室给出的照射量校准因子NX获得N60CoD,w及ND,w,Q0。方法:根据TG-21和TG-51号协议推导出N60CoD,w/NX;根据IAEATRS-277及398号报告推导出ND,w,Q0/NX。结果:CapintecPR-06C的N60CoD,w/NX和ND,w,Q0/NX值分别为0.949和0.960,单位10-2Gy/R;NE2571,0.956和0.957;PTW30001,0.954和0.956。结论:ND,w,Q0的理论值有可能比N60CoD,w的更准确;不同指形电离室的N60CoD,w和ND,w,Q0的理论值变化并不显著。 Objective: The TG-51 protocol of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine uses ion chambers with absorbed-dose-to water calibration factor, ND,w^60Co. Similarly, TRS-398 of the International Atomic Energy Agency requires calibration factor in term of absorbed dose to water for dosimeter, ND,w,Q0. There is no analogical protocol or code in China. We compute the ND,w^60Co/NX and ND,w,Q0/NX ratios for three ion chambers, Capintec PR-06C, NE2571 and PTW 30001, in order to indirectly get ND,w^60Co or ND,w,Q0, for the National Standard Dosimetry Laboratory can only provide exposure calibration factor,Nx. Methods: The ND,w^60Co ratios are formulated according to the TG-21 and TG-51 protocols and the ND,w,Q0/NX ratios are acquired on the basis of TRS-277 and TRS-398. Results: The values of ND,w^60Co/NX and ND,w,Q0/NX ratios for Capintec PR-06C are 0.949 and 0.960, unit 10-2Gy/R; NE2571, 0.956 and 957; PTW 30001; 0.954 and 0.956, respectively. Conclusions: The theoretical value of ND,w,Q0 is more precise than that of ND,w^60Co The theoretical values of ND,w^60Co and ND,w,Q0/NX for different Farmer chambers vary in a narrow range.
出处 《中国医学物理学杂志》 CSCD 2009年第4期1270-1272,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
关键词 水模体吸收剂量校准因子 照射量校准因子 电离室 calibration factor in term of absorbed dose to water exposure calibration factor ion chamber
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1AAPM TG-51.Clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams[J].Med Plays,1999,26(9):1847-1871.
  • 2IAEA.Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy:An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water,Technical Report Series No.398[M].Vienna:IAEA,2000.
  • 3AAPM TG-21.A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams[J].Mad Phys,1983,10(6):741-771.
  • 4IAEA.Absorbed dose determination in photon and electron beams:An International Code of Practice,Technical Reports Series No.277 (2nd edn in 1997)[M].Vienna:IAEA,1987.
  • 5Tailor RC,Hanson WF.Calculated absorbed-dose ratios,TG51/TG21,for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies[J].Med Phys,2002,29(7):1464-1472.
  • 6Tailor RC,Hanson WF,Wells N,et al.Consistency of absorbed dose to water measurements using 21 ion-chamber models following the AAPM TG51 and TG21 calibration protocols[J].Med Plays,2006,33(6):1818-1828.

同被引文献18

  • 1IAEA. Absorbed Dose Determination in Photon and Electron Beams: An International Code of Practice, Technical Reports Series No. 277 (2nd edn in 1997)[M]. Vienna: IAEA, 1987.
  • 2AAPM TG-51. Clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams[J]. Med Phys, 1999, 26(9): 1847-1871.
  • 3IAEA. Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water, Technical Report Series No.398[M]. Vienna: IAEA, 2000.
  • 4AAPM TG-21. A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams [J]. Med Phys, 1983, 10 (6): 741-771.
  • 5Burns JE. Conversion of PDD for photon beams from one SSD to another and calculation of TAR, TMR and TPR. In: Central axis depth dose data for use in radiotherapy: 1996, BJR Supplement 25[M]. London: British Institute of Radiology. 1996: 153-157.
  • 6Accuray Inc. Physice essentials guide [M]. Sunnyvale: Accuray Incorporated. 2006: 2-62/2-81.
  • 7Huq MS, Andreo P, Song H. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Phys Med Biol. 2001 Nov;46 (11):2985-3006.
  • 8Lopez Medina A, Teijeiro A, Salvador F, et al. Comparison between TG-51 and TRS-398: electron contamination effect on photon beam-quality specification. Phys Med Biol. 2004 Jan 7;49(1):17-32.
  • 9Araki F, Kubo HD. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols. Med Phys. 2002 May;29 (5):857--68.
  • 10JJG589-2001,外照射治疗辐射源[S].北京:中国计量出版社,2001.

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部