期刊文献+

粗大运动功能分类系统和痉挛型脑性瘫痪儿童高危因素相关性分析 被引量:11

The relationship between gross motor function classification system and risk factors in spastic cerebral palsy children
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨粗大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS)与痉挛型脑性瘫痪儿童高危因素的相关性。方法:收集2004年2月—2007年2月于北京儿童医院神经康复中心治疗的116名痉挛型脑瘫儿童的基本信息和高危因素,应用GMFCS对粗大运动能力进行分级。使用多元逐步回归方法进行相关性分析。结果:116例痉挛型脑性瘫痪儿童中孕龄<37周的早产儿70例(62.5%),<2500g的低出生体重60例(54.5%),出生窒息46例(39.7%),孕期感染27例(23.3%),双胎16例(13.8%),早产合并低出生体重为进入回归方程的变量,回归方程有意义(P<0.001)。结论:早产合并低出生体重与GMFCS相关,更倾向于发展为GMFCSⅢ。出生窒息、孕期感染和双胎与GMFCS无关。 Objective: To investigate the relationship between gross motor function classification system(GMFCS) and risk factors in spastic cerebral palsy children.method: The basic information and risk factors in 116 spastic cerebral palsy children were collected. GMFCS was used to define the classification for gross motor function. Step wise regression was used to analyse the relationship between GMFCS and risk factors. Result: Among the 116 cases of spastic cerebral palsy, 70 cases (62.5%) were preterm (gestational age,GA〈37 weeks); 60 cases (54.5%) had low birth weight (〈2500g); 46 cases (39.7%) had asphyxia at birth; 27 cases (23.3%) had infections during pregnancy; and 16 cases(13.8%) were twins. Preterm and low birth weight were the variables included by regression equation (P〈0.001). Conclusion: Preterm and low birth weight correlate with GMFCS and could be more likely to be GMFCSⅢ. Asphyxia at birth, infection during pregnancy and twins do not correlate with GMFCS.
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第7期607-609,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
基金 美国亚利桑那州科研基金(Y410503) 国家科委国际合作项目(2008DFA31850) 北京市科委国际合作项目(2007G05) 北京市中医药科技项目(JJ2005-17)
关键词 脑性瘫痪 高危因素 粗大运动功能分类系统 cerebral palsy risk factor gross motor function classification system
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1中华医学会儿科学分会神经学组.小儿脑性瘫痪的定义、诊断条件及分型[J].中华儿科杂志,2005,43(4):262-262. 被引量:1109
  • 2Palisano R,Rosenbaum P,Walter S,et al.Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy[J].Dev Med Child Neurol,1997,39 (4):214-223.
  • 3Lundkvist A,Granat E,Nordmark E,et al.interrater reliability of the Gross Motor Function Classification System in a Swedish version[J].Dev Med Child Neurol,1999,41(81):18-22.
  • 4陆华宝,张雁,刘建军,陈晓燕,丘小奎,吴卫红,李燕春,胡莹媛.脑性瘫痪儿童粗大运动功能分级系统初步研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,2005,11(10):841-842. 被引量:15
  • 5Kondo I,Hosokawa K,Soma M,et al.Gross motor function classification system:preliminary study for Japanese children[J].Am J Phys Med Rehabil,2003,82(2):116-121.
  • 6史惟,王素娟,杨红,朱默,王艺.中文版脑瘫患儿粗大运动功能分级系统的信度和效度研究[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2006,1(2):122-129. 被引量:166
  • 7Papavasiliou AS,Rapidi CA,Rizou C,et al.Reliability of Greek version Gross Motor Function Classification System[J].Brain & Development,2007,29(2):79-82.
  • 8Rosenbaum P,Walter SD,Hanna SE,et al.Prognosis for gross motor function in cerebral palsy:creation of motor development curves[J].J A M A,2002,288 (11):1357-1363.
  • 9Palisano R,Rosenbaum P,Barlett D,et al.Gross Motor Function Classification System Expanded and Revised(GMFCS-E&R)[M].Canada:CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research,2007.1-4.
  • 10World Health Organization.International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health[M].Geneva:World Health Organization.2001.

二级参考文献50

共引文献1299

同被引文献96

引证文献11

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部