期刊文献+

ERCP术后并发胰周及腹膜后脓肿的非手术处理 被引量:3

Experience in treatment of post-ERCP peripancreatic and retroperitoneal abscess formation with non-operation management
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的总结ERCP术后并发胰周及腹膜后脓肿的非手术处理方法并评价其临床应用价值。方法该组共收集2000年以来笔者遇到的5例ERCP后并发胰周及后腹膜脓肿的病人,所有病例均采用B超或CT引导下穿刺、于脓肿最低位处置入菊花头引流管引流。非手术处理还包括抗炎、抑酶药物的使用等。结果所有病人均经引流等治疗后痊愈,引流时间在20~90d不等,平均引流时间为52.4d。总住院时间在35~165d不等。平均91.8d,无一例中转手术治疗。结论穿刺引流术治疗ERCP术后造成的胰周脓肿或后腹膜脓肿安全有效,具有创伤小、痛苦轻、恢复快、并发症少等优点。穿刺点应尽可能选定在脓肿的最低位,可达到最佳的引流效果。 Objective To investigate the technique and clinic value o[ non operation management for ERCP-related peripancreatic and retroperitoneal abscess. Methods Five patients with post-ERCP peripancreatic and retroperitoneal abscess were reviewed. Guided by ultrasonic or CT, all the 5 pa tients underwent puncture and the drainage tube was disposed to the lowest place of abscess. Non operation managements for patients also included the use of anti inflammatory drugs and enzyme activity inhibition drugs. Results All patients responded to the draining treatment and discharged from hospi tal after complete recovery. There was no conversion to surgical intervention. Mean draining duration was 52.4(20-90)d and average hospital stay was 91.8(35-165)d. Conclusion Puncture and drainage management is an effective and safe approach for post-ERCP peripancreatic and retroperitoneal abscess. It has advantages of less trauma, less pain, fast recovery and low rate of complications. Puncture point should be situated at the bottom or lowest position of abscess and drainage can achieve the best results.
作者 袁庆丰 张啸
出处 《中华肝胆外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第7期506-508,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
关键词 手术后并发症 ERCP 脓肿形成 非手术 Pastoperative complication ERCP Abscess formation Non operation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献28

共引文献230

同被引文献13

  • 1Russo G,Lichtner M,Carnevalini M,et al.Primary retroperitoneal abscesses due to Rhodococcus equi in a patient with severe nephrotic syndrome:successful antibiotic treatment with linezolid and tigecycline.Int J Infect Dis,2010,14(6):533-535.
  • 2Papasanas PK,Caushaj PF,Gagne DJ.Spilled gallstones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.J Laparoendo Adv Surg Tech A,2002,12(5):383-386.
  • 3Theisen J,Bartels H,Weiss W,et al.Current concepts of percutaneous abscess drainage in postoperative retention.J Gastrointest Surg,2005,9(2):280-283.
  • 4Starizu M, Ewe K, Meyer Z. Endoscopic papillary dilation (EPD) for treatment of common bile duct stones and papillary stenosis[J]. Endoscopy, 1983,15:197-198.
  • 5Attain R, Freeman ML. Endoscopic papillary large balloon di- lation for large common bile duct stones[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2009,16:618-623.
  • 6Freeman ML, Disario JA, Nelson DB, et alo Risk factors for post ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, muhicenter study[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2001,54 : 425-434.
  • 7Akashi R, Kiyozumi T, Tanaka T, et al. Mechanism of pan- ereatitis caused by ERCP[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2002,55 : 50-54.
  • 8Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Fockens P, et al. Randomized trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones[J]. Lancer, 1997,349 : 1124-1129.
  • 9Ochi Y, Mukawa K, Kiyosama K, et al. Comparing the treat- ment outcomes of endoscopic papillary dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duet stones[J]. J Gastroen terol Hepatol, 1999,14:90-96.
  • 10Ohashi A, Tamada K, Wada S, et al. Risk factors for recur rent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: long-term follow up study[J]. Dig Endosc, 2009,21:73-77.

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部