摘要
目的:探讨股骨髁上骨折两种内固定治疗的效果。方法:对80例股骨髁上骨折患者分别采用2种不同的内固定治疗,逆行带锁髓内钉(GSH)40例,股骨动力髁螺钉(DCS)40例,并进行临床分析。结果:2种内固定方式的骨折愈合率没有统计学差异(P>0.05)。2种固定方式的HSS评分显示,DCS优于GSH组,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:内固定治疗股骨髁上骨折可获得良好的效果。股骨动力髁螺钉(DCS)可有效治疗股骨远端骨折,具有操作简便、直观、固定牢固等优点。
Objective： To discuss the clinical effects of supracondylar femur fracture treated with two kinds of internal fixation methods. Methods： 80 cases of supracondylar femor fractures were divided into retrograde interlocking intramedullary nail （GSH） group and femur dynamic condylar screw （DCS） group, 40 cases treated with GSH,another 40 cases treated with DCS, then compared the clinical effects of two groups. Results： Fracture healing rate of two groups had no significant difference （P〉0.05）. HSS score of DCS group was better than GSH group, the difference was significant （P〈 0.05）. Conclusion： The clinical effect was good for supracondylar femur fracture treated with internal fixation. DCS is an effective treatment method for distal femoral fractures, it is simple, intuitive, and fixed firmly.
出处
《中国医药导报》
CAS
2009年第21期33-34,共2页
China Medical Herald
