期刊文献+

中国上市公司股东投票出席行为研究--基于股权分置改革分类表决的实证分析 被引量:5

Study on Shareholders' Voting Participation of Chinese Publicly Listed Companies——Based on the Empirical Evidence from the Reform on Nontradable Shares
原文传递
导出
摘要 股权分置改革是中国资本市场针对公司治理基础的一项根本性制度变迁,股东投票出席行为是中国资本市场上市公司治理的重要环节。本文利用股权分置改革分类表决数据,从影响投票出席率因素的角度探讨中小股东的投票参与行为以及高通过率与低参与率同时存在的原因。实证研究结果表明:提案通过率与流通股集中度、网投人均持股数和非流通股比例均正相关;投票出席率随流通股集中度、网投人均持股数的增加而上升且随股改进度呈下降趋势。流通股高赞成率与相对较低参与率同时存在的现象表明,众多流通股股东倾向于稳定地选择策略性弃权。 Reform on nontradable shares is one of the fundamental institutional changes of Chinese capital market which is focused on corporate governance of Chinese publicly listed companies. Voter participation is one of the core parts in corporate governance, so by using the voting data of different types of shareholders in the reform, from the perspective of factors affecting voter participation rate, the paper explores minority shareholders' voting participation and the reasons why high pass rate and low turnout coexist. The empirical results show that proposal pass rate positively correlates with the ownership concentration of tradable shares, average shares per intemet voter and the rate of nontradable shares. Voter participation rate increases with the rise of the ownership concentration of tradable shares and average shares per internet voter, and decrease along with the proceeding of reform on nontradable shares. The coexistence of high approval rate and low turnout implies that massive minority shareholders choose to abstain strategically.
出处 《金融论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第7期45-51,共7页 Finance Forum
关键词 股权分置改革 投票出席率 投票行为 公司治理 reform on nontradable shares voter participation rate voting behavior corporate governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1丁志国,苏治,杜晓宇.股权分置改革均衡对价[J].中国工业经济,2006(2):113-119. 被引量:17
  • 2苏梅,寇纪淞,陈富赞.股权分置改革中股东间博弈的实证研究[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(1):54-61. 被引量:12
  • 3吴文锋,徐晓慧,吴冲锋.股权分置改革中的投资者市场反应研究[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(z1):285-288. 被引量:1
  • 4宗计川.基于个体决策视角的投票出席率实验研究述评[J].外国经济与管理,2007,29(2):39-44. 被引量:3
  • 5Borgers, T., 2004. Costly Voting [J]. American Economic Review, (94):57-66.
  • 6Bomstein, G., 1992. The Free-Rider Problem in Inter-group Conflicts over Step-Level and Continuous Public Goods [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4 ):597-606.
  • 7Downs, A., 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy [M]. New York: Harper and Row.
  • 8Feddersen, Timothy J., and Wolfgang, Pesendorfer, 1999. Absetention in Elections with Asymmetric Information and Diverse Preferences [J]. American Political Science Review. 93(2):381-98.
  • 9GroBer, J., and Schram, A., 2006. Neighborhood Information Exchange and Voter Participation: An Experimental Study [J], American Political Science Review, 100(2) : 235-248.
  • 10Levine, D. K., and Palfrey, T., 2005. The Paradox of Voter Participation, A Laboratory Study [R]. Working Paper, UCLA and Princeton University. Downloadable: http://levine.ssenet.ucla.edu/papers.htm.

二级参考文献45

共引文献25

同被引文献121

引证文献5

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部