期刊文献+

宫颈癌筛查中液基细胞学研究 被引量:5

Analysis on liquid-based cytology test in the screening of cervical cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价液基细胞学(LPT)薄片制片对宫颈癌筛查的准确性。方法:对3600例和2200例受检者分别进行LPT制片和传统宫颈细胞涂片法进行宫颈癌筛查。细胞诊断采用TBS分级系统,阳性诊断包括意义不明的不典型鳞状上皮(ASCUS)以上病变。所有ASCUS以上病变的受检者全部在阴道镜下活检。结果:LPT薄片法和传统涂片法对ASCUS以上病变检出阳性率分别为10.5%和5.2%,两种检测方法的阳性率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);两种制片方法的阳性结果与病理检查符合率比较:LPT薄片法检出SCC、HSIL、LSIL与阴道镜活检阳性符合率分别为100%、91%、82%,传统宫颈巴氏涂片法检出SCC、HSIL、LSIL与阴道镜活检阳性符合率分别为100%、60%、53%,两种方法比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:LPT液基细胞学检查敏感性明显高于传统宫颈细胞涂片法,能大大提高检出率,尤其是对宫颈癌前筛查的患者。 Objective : To evaluate the accuracy of liquid - based cytology test in the screening of cervical cancer. Methods: 3 600 and 2 200 subjects were screened for cervical cancer by liquid - based cytology test and traditional cervical cells smears, respectively. Cell diagnosis adopted TBS - group system, positive diagnosis included above - ASCUS pathological changes. All the subjects of above - ASCUS pathological changes were examined under colposcope. Results : The detection rates of above - ASCUS pathological changes identified by liquid - based cytology test and traditional smears were 10. 5% and 5.2 %, respectively ( P 〈 0. 01 ) . The coincidence rates of SCC, HSIL and LSIL detected by liquid - based cytology test and biopsy under colposcope were 100%, 91% and 82%, respectively, while the coinci- dence rates detected by traditional cervical cells smears and biopsy under eolposcope were 100% , 60% and 53%, respectively (P 〈 0. 05 ) Conclusion: The sensitivity and detection rate of liquid - based cytology test are higher than those of traditional cervical cells smears, especially for pre - screening of cervical cancer.
作者 王赫
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2009年第21期3004-3005,共2页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
关键词 宫颈癌 液基细胞学 TBS诊断 Cervical cancer Liquid based cytology TBS diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献7

  • 1赖炜玲,屈秦红,籍生萍,牛新强.TCT在妇产科临床的应用[J].临床医药实践,2004,13(12):917-918. 被引量:9
  • 2Bernstein SJ, Sanchez-Ramos L, Ndubisi B. Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: a meta-analysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001,185(2): 308-317.
  • 3Solomon D, Davey, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesa System: termiology for reportingresult of cervical cytology [J]. Jama, 2002,
  • 4刘树范,临床细胞学,1990年,31页
  • 5杨大望,肿瘤细胞学彩色图谱,1977年,78页
  • 6杨大望,阴道细胞学,1958年,1页
  • 7雷孝玉,谭世桥.1002例女职工妇科普查结果分析[J].预防医学情报杂志,2001,17(4):243-244. 被引量:21

共引文献99

同被引文献16

  • 1张江宇,赖日权,张佳立,吴坤河,彭秀红,郜红艺,何平花.宫颈液基细胞学涂片假阴性原因分析[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2005,21(6):663-665. 被引量:30
  • 2崔艳萍,王文.ThinPrep液基细胞学在宫颈癌筛查中的临床应用[J].赣南医学院学报,2006,26(2):186-188. 被引量:16
  • 3Renshaw AA, Young NA, Birdsong GG, et al. Comparison of performance of conventional and Thinprep gynecologicp reparations in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program [J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2004, 128(1): 17-22.
  • 4Nance KV. Evolution of Pap testifig at a community hospital: a ten year experience [J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 2007, 35(3): 148-153.
  • 5Solomon D, DaveyD, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: Terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology[J]. JAMA, 2002, 287 (16) : 2114-2119.
  • 6Guo M,Hu L,Martin L et al. Accuracy of liquid - based Paptests : comparison of concurrent liquid - based test and cervicalbiopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smear[J] . Acta Cytol, 2005,49 (2) : 132.
  • 7Diane S, Diane D,Robert K et al. The 2001 Bethesda systemterminnology for reporting results of cervical cytology〔 J〕. JA-MA, 2002, 287: 2114.
  • 8Jemal A,Bray F,Center MM,et al.Global cancer statistics[J],CA Cancer J Clin,2011,61 (2):69-90.
  • 9Tarkanen J,Auvinen E,Nieminen P,et al.HPV DNAtesting as an adjunct in the management of patients with low grade cytological lesions in Finland[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2007,86 (3):367-372.
  • 10谭学君,黄光炜,叶丽群.宫颈细胞刷取材:传统涂片与液基涂片的比较分析[J].右江民族医学院学报,2007,29(6):880-882. 被引量:5

引证文献5

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部