摘要
针对近年来有些学者对"技击是武术的本质"提出的质疑,运用文献资料法、逻辑分析法等研究方法展开研究。首先综述了近年来有关武术本质问题研究的文献,发现大多数学者坚持"技击是武术的本质"这一观点,只有少数学者提出异议。为彻底辨明是非,同时追本溯源,到《辞源》、《辞海》中寻找依据,根据对"本质"一词的原始界定可知:"本质"是"事物本来的性质",是"事物本身所固有的根本属性",据此可得出结论:一些提出质疑的学者混淆了本质、文化特色、价值功能几个词语的具体含义,他们所论特征是武术在发展过程中逐渐形成的,并非武术"本来的性质",也不是武术"所固有的根本属性",武术原本是一种技击术,因此,武术的本质仍然是技击。
Aimed at some scholars＇ query to the standpoint that attacking-and - defending is Wushu＇s nature, we adopt documentary data method,logical analysis method to study. First,the documents about Wushu＇s nature are summarized,on which we can see that much more scholars persist in the standpoint that attacking and defending is Wushu＇s nature and only a few scholarsquestion the standpoint. In order to find out the truth,we go back to Cihai and Ciyuan to look for the foundation. According to the definition to the word nature that is the inherent character of something,we can conclude that some scholars confound the meaning of the words such as nature,cultural character,value,and what they argue wzs not inherent, but come into being step by step in Wushu＇s development course,so Wushu＇s nature is also attacking and defending.
出处
《首都体育学院学报》
北大核心
2009年第4期420-422,461,共4页
Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports
基金
2008年国家体育总局武术研究院项目<武术的理论根基及文化特质研究>(批号:WSH2008D014)
关键词
武术
本质
特征
功能
技击
Wushu
nature
character, value
attacking and defending
