期刊文献+

椎弓根钉固定的侧后方植骨融合和径后路椎体间融合治疗老年人腰椎滑脱症的效果评价 被引量:4

Posterior fusion versus posterior interbody fusion in segmental spinal fixation for aged spondylolisthesis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察应用椎弓根螺钉内固定技术,并分别结合侧后方融合(PLF)和经后路椎体间融合(PLIF)两种方法治疗老年人腰椎滑脱症的临床效果。方法应用枢法模公司生产的TSRH-3D腰椎后路内固定系统治疗30例腰椎滑脱症患者,其中14例患者实施TSRH-3D内固定加侧后方植骨融合(PTJF);16例患者行TSRH-3D内固定加经后路椎体间融合(PLIF),进行术前术后功能、症状评分。结果30例患者均达到良好的融合效果;实施PLF患者,Prolo功能和症状评分分别为1.25和1.64;术前腰椎滑脱角为48.6%,术后恢复至17.5%。实施PLIF患者,Prolo功能和症状评分分别为1.18和1.39;术前腰椎滑脱角为44.2%,术后恢复至20.3%。结论治疗成人腰椎滑脱症,应用TSRH-3D腰椎后路内固定系统可以获得牢固稳定,在保持腰椎术后功能恢复方面,PLIF优于PLF,但临床结果尚无明显差异。 Objective Clinical and radiographic results in 30 consecutive patients undergoing posterior lumbar fixation and posterior facet joint or posterior interbody fusion for Meyerding Grade Ⅱ/Ⅲ spondylolisthesis were assessed: (1) to address the suitability of a dynamic stabilization; and (2) to investigate whether there are differences in terms of clinical and functional results between these two types of arthrodesis. Methods Fourteen patients underwent posterior interfacet fusion (PLF) and implantation of TSRH-3D system. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and placement of the same system were performed in 16 patients. Clinical, economic, functional and radiographic data were recorded both pre- and postoperatively. Results The average changes in Prolo Scale of economic and functional scores were 1.25 and 1.64 respectively, in patients undergoing posterior fusion ; the average measured vertebral slippage was 48.6% (range 32% -65% ) preoperatively and 17. 5% (range 15% -25% ) postoperatively. In patients undergoing PLIF, the average changes in economic and functional score were 1.18 and 1.39 respectively, and the average preoperative vertebral slippage was 44. 2% ( range 30% - 55% ) versus 20. 3% ( range 18% -26% ) postoperatively. Conclusion The use of a segmental pedicle screw fixation with TSRH-3D was able to successfully combine the goal of solid fusion with the requirements of nerve root decompression. When these two fusion techniques were compared, PLIF was superior to PLF because of an overall superior reliability and system resistance. But their clinical outcomes did not differ greatly ( P 〉 0. 05 ).
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第25期1779-1782,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 脊柱融合术 腰椎 减压术 外科 Spinal fusion Lumbar vertebrae Decompression, spinal
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Vamvanij V,Ferrara LA,Hai Y,et al.Quantitative changes in spinal canal dimensions using interbody distraction for spondylolisthesis.Spine,2001,26:13-18.
  • 2La Rosa G,Conti A,Cacciola F.Pedicle screw fixation for isdunic spondylolisthesis:does posterior lumbar interbody fusion improve outcome over posterolateral fusion? J Neurosurg (Spine 2),2003,99:143-150.
  • 3Blumenthal SL,Ohnmeiss DD.NASS Intervertebral cages for degenerative spinal diseases.Spine J,2003,3:301-309.
  • 4Miyakoshi N,Abe E,Shimada Y,et al.Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondy|olisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion.Spine,2000,25:1837-1842.
  • 5Cripton PA,Jnin GM,Wittenberg RH,et al.Load-sharing characteristics of stabilized lumbar spine segments.Spine,2000,25:170-179.
  • 6Barsa P,Buchvald P,Suchomel P,et al.Traumatic spondylolisthesis of L5-S1.Acta Chir Orthop Tranmatol Cech,2003,70:121-125.
  • 7李淳德.脊柱内固定融合术在腰椎退变性疾病治疗中的作用[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(25):1734-1736. 被引量:20
  • 8Yu Biesheng,Abumi KY,Oda I,et al.Load-sharing characteristics of the anterior and posterior elements in human lumbar spine.Hokkaido Med Sci,2003,79:222-234.
  • 9邱贵兴,李书纲,翁习生,田野,林进,王以朋,仉建国,金今,赵宏,沈建雄.通用型脊柱椎弓根内固定系统的研制及临床初步应用[J].中华医学杂志,2003,83(23):2040-2044. 被引量:8
  • 10Cseosei GI,Klekner AP,Dobni J,et al.Posterior interbady fusion using laminectomy bone and transpedicular scow fixation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.Surg Neurol,2000,53:2-7.

二级参考文献44

  • 1董天华,唐天驷,郑祖根,沈忆新,成茂华,华金明.椎弓根钢板治疗胸腰椎骨折存在的问题(附90例分析)[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,1993,8(1):16-18. 被引量:41
  • 2原林,朱青安,王兴海,卢海俊,钟世镇.腰骶段脊柱的三维运动范围[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,1994,12(2):154-155. 被引量:23
  • 3Yammoto I, Panjabi MM, Criscol T,et al. Three-dimensional movement of the whole lumbar spine and lumbarsacral joint. Spine, 1989, 14:1256-1260.
  • 4Roy-camille R, Saillant G, Berteaux O, et al. Osteosynthesis of thoral-lumbar spine fracrture with metal plates screwed through the vertebral pedicles. Recorstr Surg, 1976, 15:2-16.
  • 5Meyerding HW: Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 54: 371, 1932.
  • 6Yuan HS, Garfin SR, Dickman CA, et al. A historical cohort study of pedicle screw fixation in thoracic, lumbar, and scral spine fusions. Spine, 1994, 19(Suppl):2279-2296.
  • 7Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V. Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. Spine, 1993, 18:2331-2339.
  • 8Pihlajamaki H, Myllynen P, Bosteman O. Complications of transpedicular lumbosacral fixation for non-traumatic disorders. J Bone and Joint Surg (Br), 1997, 79:183-189.
  • 9Blumenthal S, Gillk. Complications of the wiltse pedicle screw fixation system. Spine, 1993, 18:1867-1871.
  • 10West JL, Ogilvie JW, Bradford DS. Complications of the variable screw plate fixation. Spine, 1991, 16:576-579.

共引文献26

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部