期刊文献+

APACHEⅡ评分在CCU分级监护中的应用 被引量:11

Application of APACHEⅡ Score in CCU Hierarchical Monitoring
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)在指导冠心病监护室(coronary care unit,CCU)护士评估重危患者的应用价值,构建与实施基于APACHEⅡ评分的分级监护程序。方法对123例CCU的急性冠脉综合征和急性心功能不全患者进行APACHEⅡ评分并预测死亡率,通过对生存组和死亡组病例资料统计分析,检测APACHEⅡ评分在CCU应用的有效性。结果生存组和死亡组APACHEⅡ分值和预测死亡率差异显著(P<0.01);随治疗时间的延长生存组APACHEⅡ分值呈下降趋势,死亡组APACHEⅡ分值呈上升趋势;APACHEⅡ评分≥21分的患者死亡率高。结论APACHEⅡ评分可用于CCU内护士量化评估患者病情严重程度,为CCU分级监护提供依据。 Objective To assess the instructive value of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ) score for nurses in coronary care unit (CCU) to evaluate patients with severe heart disease, to construct and develop the hierarchical monitoring system based on APACHE Ⅱ score. Methods 123 patients enrolled in CCU with acute coronary syndrom (ACS) and acute heart failure were evaluated by APACHEⅡ score,and their mortality was predicted. The validity of APACHE Ⅱ sore in CCU monitoring was statistical investigation of the scores in survival group and death group. Results There was significant difference in APACHEⅡ score between survival group and death group (P〈 0. 01 ). As treatment continued, the score of survival group decreased while the score of the death group increased. Patients with the score more than 21 had high death-rate. Conclusion APACHEⅡ score is an effective method for CCU nurses to evaluate disease severity,and can supply beneficial reference for CCU hierachical monitoring.
出处 《华南国防医学杂志》 CAS 2009年第3期76-77,85,共3页 Military Medical Journal of South China
关键词 APACHEⅡ评分 CCU 分级监护 Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ Coronary care unit Hierarchical monitoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献34

  • 1梁建业.危重病患者病情评定法——APACHE系统的研究进展[J].中国危重病急救医学,1996,8(1):52-56. 被引量:66
  • 2曹国良,乔永芳,刘新兵,俞建华.辛伐他汀早期干预对非ST抬高型急性冠脉综合征细胞因子水平的影响[J].实用诊断与治疗杂志,2006,20(7):478-480. 被引量:40
  • 3顾伟,殷文朋,李春盛.肌钙蛋白Ⅰ和APACHEⅡ评分在危重病患者预后中的应用价值[J].中国实用内科杂志,2007,27(17):1373-1375. 被引量:27
  • 4Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE Ⅱ: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med, 1985,13:818-829.
  • 5Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al. The APACHE Ⅲ prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest, 1991,100:1619-1636.
  • 6Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med,1981,9:591-597.
  • 7Cook DA. Performance of APACHE Ⅲ models in an Australian ICU. Chest,2000,118:1732-1738.
  • 8Knaus WA,Draper EA,Wager DP,etal.APACHEⅡ:a severity of disease classification[J].Crit Care Med,1985,13:818.
  • 9Guccione A, Morena A, Pezzi A, et al. The assessment of nursing workload [ J ]. Minerva Anestesiol,2004,70 (5) :411 ~ 416.
  • 10Viney C, Poxon I, Jordan C, et al. Does the APACHE Ⅱ scoring system equate with the Nottingham Patient Dependency System? Can these systems be used to determine nursing workload and skill mix?[J]. Nurs Crit Care,1997,2(2) :59,62 ~63.

共引文献61

同被引文献138

引证文献11

二级引证文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部