期刊文献+

中美制造业国际竞争力比较:基于产业竞争力层次观点的实证分析 被引量:37

Measurement to International Competitiveness of China & U.S. Manufacturings: Empirical Study Based on Hierarchical View
原文传递
导出
摘要 尽管国际竞争力早已成为经济与管理研究的一个重要领域,但目前学术界还没有就产业国际竞争力的评价体系和量化指标形成统一意见。本文基于产业竞争力的层次观点,初步构造了产业国际竞争力的评价体系,采用生产率、市场份额和利润率三个不同层次的指标,依据中国制造业30个种类2007年的数据进行了实证分析,并将其与美国制造业相应种类进行对比研究,以求揭示产业竞争力各层次评价指标之间的相互关系,以及这一指标体系评价结果的政策含义。 Although international competitiveness has already become an important field of economics and management research, the agreement has not yet been reached for the measurement system and quantitative indicators. This paper constructs the measurement system for Chiua's manufaeturings on basis of the hierarchical view for industrial international competitiveness, uses indicators from three levels productivity, market share and profitability to measure the 30 manufaeturings of China in 2007, and makes a comparison to the U.S., to verify the validity of this measurement system, to reveal the correlation of indicators in different levels, and to get policy implications from the empirical study.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期57-66,共10页 China Industrial Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目"跨国公司的投资动机差异:国际生产中的比较优势原理"(批准号08JA630057)
关键词 制造业 国际竞争力 中美比较 层次观点 实证分析 manufacturings international competitiveness China -U.S. comparison hierarchical view empirical study
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Carlin, W., A. Glyn and J. V. Reenen. Export Market Performance of OECD Countries: An Empirical Examination of the Role of Cost Competitiveness[J]. The Economic Journal, 2001, 111(468).
  • 2Choudhri, E. and L. Schembri. Productivity Performance and International Competitiveness:An Old Text Reconsidered[J]. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 2002,35(2).
  • 3Ezeala-Harrison, F. Canada's Global Competitiveness Challenge: Trade Performance Versus Total Factor Productivity Measures[J]. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1995,54(1 ).
  • 4Jorgenson, D. and K. Stiroh. Industry-level Productivity and Competitiveness Between Canada and the Unitied States:U.S. Econimic Growth at the Industry Level[J]. American Economic Review, 2000, 90(2).
  • 5Krugman, P. Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession[J]. Foreign Affairs, 1994, 73(2).
  • 6Lee, F. and J. Tang. Productivity Levels and International Competitiveness Between Canadian and U.S. Industries[J]. The American Economic Review, 2000, 90(2).
  • 7Porter, M. The Competitive Advantage of Nations[M]. Macmillan, London, 1990.
  • 8Vollrath, T. and De Huu Vo. Investigating the Nature of World Agricultural Competitiveness[R]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 1988,(December).
  • 9蔡昉,王德文,王美艳.工业竞争力与比较优势——WTO框架下提高我国工业竞争力的方向[J].管理世界,2003,19(2):58-63. 被引量:79
  • 10陈佳贵,张金昌.实现利润优势——中美具有国际竞争力产业的比较[J].国际贸易,2002(5):21-24. 被引量:51

二级参考文献158

共引文献1099

同被引文献482

引证文献37

二级引证文献400

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部