摘要
目的:比较2种评估表对神经外科住院患者压疮的预测能力。方法:将符合纳入标准的266例神经外科患者分别进行Braden评估表和Waterlow压疮危险评估表评分。结果:Braden评估表有较理想预测效果,敏感性为83.02%、特异性为86.41%、阳性预测值为61.11%、阴性预测值为95.19%。Waterlow评估表有较理想的诊断价值,敏感性为90.57%、特异性为72.33%、阳性预测值为45.71%、阴性预测值为90.85%。结论:Braden评估表能较好地平衡敏感度和特异度,对神经外科患者压疮发生的预测效果较好。
Objective：To compare the prediction ability of Braden evaluation sheet and Waterlow evaluation sheet in the patients with neurosurgical diseases. Methods：266 patients participated in this study. Each patient was evaluated by the nurses with Braden evaluation sheet and Waterlow evaluation sheet. Results ：To Braden evaluation sheet the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 83.02% ,86.41%, 61.11% ,95.19% ,respectively.To Waterlow evaluation sheet,the sensitivity,specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 90.57%, 72.33% ,45.71% ,90.85%, respectively. Conclusion：Braden evaluation sheet can make a good balance in both sensitivity and specificity,and shows good prediction of pressure ulcer in the patients with neurosurgical diseases.
出处
《现代医药卫生》
2009年第14期2122-2124,共3页
Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
