期刊文献+

再论转轨经济法学:一个务虚的伪命题——对《时代法学》2009年第1期相关观点的回应 被引量:2

On the Transitional Economic Law Again:A Fictitious Pseudo-Proposition
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国经济法的困境不是因为我们使用了西方范式的经济法理论,而是市场经济不成熟及其体制性障碍。如果没有认识到问题的实质,无论如何变换经济法概念,只能形成诸多务虚的伪命题。真正把握中国经济法困境的学者应当建立在充分认识现实国情背后体制性障碍的前提下,发挥经济法的前瞻性功能和预防性功能,构建经济法具体制度,做经济法力所能及的事情,并以此推动政治、经济体制改革的进一步深化,协助突破经济法困境背后的体制性障碍。如果经济法越位思考,将使经济法变得"四不像",最终将肢解经济法,并给反对经济法是独立部门法的人提供了强有力的藉口。 The plight of China's Economic Law is not because we use the Economic Law theory of Western paradigm, but an immature market economy and its institutional obstacles. If we don't realize the substance of the issue, we should have lots of the Fictitious pseudo-proposition, in any case the transformation of Economic Law' concept. Scholars who grasp the plight of China's Economic Law truly should understand the institutional obstacles behind the actual situation fully, play the forward-looking function and preventive function of Economic Law, build specific systems of Economic Law, do things which Economic Law can do, in order to deepen further political and economic structural reforms, and to help to break through the institutional obstacles behind the plight of Economic Law. ff Economic Law thinks offside, it will become "neither fish nor fowl", and be dismembered eventually, which will provide a strong excuse for some people who oppose Economic Law to be an independent branch law.
作者 李昌庚
出处 《时代法学》 2009年第3期9-16,共8页 Presentday Law Science
关键词 经济法 转轨经济法学 伪命题 误读 Economic Law transitional Economic Law pseudo-proposition misunderstanding
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献212

共引文献94

同被引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部