期刊文献+

听写方法对听写测试结果的影响 被引量:14

A Study of the Effects of Dictation Methods on Dictation Test Results
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究探讨听写测试方法对测试结果的影响。听写有多种测试形式,如填充听写、段落听写、听写作文等。为了探讨不同的听写测试方法是否影响测试结果,本研究采用三种听写测试方法对三组同质的受试进行测试实验。结果显示,不同的测试方法对受试的考试成绩有显著影响。 As a testing device, dictation has been developed into many types, among which partial dictation, passage dictation and dicto-comp are often adopted in some large-scale tests in China. However, to date, very few studies have been conducted to investigate the effects of test methods in a dictation test. This paper reports a study on whether different dictation methods affect test-takers' performance. Three dictation passages were designed based on the three dictation methods, namely, partial dictation, passage dictation, and dicto-comp. Three homogeneous groups of 67 students took the test respectively. Results show that different dictation methods have significant effects on the test results. However, partial dictation and passage dictation tests don't produce significant difference in mean score, but dicto-comp test is significantly different from the other two. It suggests all three types of dictation methods, if well designed, can be applied to test dictation ability.
作者 杨满珍
出处 《外语教学理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期54-60,共7页 Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献73

  • 1Bachman, L. F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing[M]. Oxford University Press.
  • 2Bae, J. & L. F. Bachman. 1998. A latent variable approach to listening and reading: Testing factorial invariance across two groups of children in the Korean/English Two-Way Immersion Program [J]. Language Testing 15: 380-414.
  • 3Bennett, R. E. & W. C. Ward. 1993. Construction versus Choice in Cognitive Measurement: Issues in Constructed Response, Performance Testing, and Portfolio Assessment [M]. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlaum Associates.
  • 4Bentler, P. M. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models [J]. Psychological Bulletin 107 : 238-46.
  • 5Bentler, P. M. & D. G. Bonett. 1980. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures [ J ]. Psychological Bulletin 88 : 588-606.
  • 6Bollen, K, A, 1989, Structural Equations with Latent Variables [M]. New York: John Wiley.
  • 7Brindley G. & H. Slatyer. 2002. Exploring task difficulty in ESL listening assessment [J]. Language Testing 19: 369-394.
  • 8Buck, G. & K. Tatsuoka. 1998. Application of the rule-space procedure to language testing: examining attributes of a free response listening test [J]. Language Testing 15: 119-57.
  • 9Buck, G. 1992. Listening comprehension: construct validity and trait characteristics [J]. Language Learning 42: 313-57.
  • 10Buck, G. 2001. Assessing Listening [M]. Cambridage University Press.

共引文献77

同被引文献244

引证文献14

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部