期刊文献+

植入型心律转复除颤器电风暴的临床随访和治疗

Clinic follow-up and management in patients with electrical storm after implantable cardioverter defibrillator
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的本文观察植入犁心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入后电风暴的发生率、临床特征、临床治疗。方法回顾性分析了51例接受ICD治疗的病人,随访2~85个月,其中9例病人出现ICD电风暴,比较ICD电风暴组和无ICD电风暴组的年龄、病因左心室射血分数(LVEF)、心功能分级、临床特征、临床治疗方案。结果有电风暴的患者与无电风暴患者相比年龄更大,差异有统计学意义[(69±14)岁对(61±8)岁];心功能分级(2.7±0.7对2.1±0.6,P〈0.05)差异有统计学意义;两组LVEF(0.38±n09对0.48±0.04,P〈0.05)差异有统计学意义。在本文中导致ICD电风暴的主要因素是心功能的减退。结论有电风暴的病人比没有电风暴的病人年龄更大,心功能更差,LVEF更低。心力衰竭的加重和焦虑导致的交感神经兴奋是电风暴发生主要的原因。抗心律失常药物胺碘酮和美托洛尔是预防和治疗电风暴的主要手段。射频消融可作药物治疗无效后减少电风暴的主要于段。 Objective The purpose of this study was to observe the incidence rate,clinical characteris- tics and management of electrical storm(ES). Methods Baseline characteristics of 51 ICD treated patients were retrospectively analyzed. Nine patients had experience of ES in the total of 51 during the follow-up of 2 - 85 months. Compared with 42 ES-free patients, age,left ventricular eject fraction NYHA class was observed, meanwhile clinic characteristics and ES management was observed. Results Univariate analysis identified older age (69 ± 14 vs 61 ± 8 ) depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ( 0. 38 ± 0. 09 vs 0. 48 ± 0. 04 ), lower heart function (2. 7 ± 0. 7 vs 2. 1 ± 0. 6) as variables significantly associated with an increased risk of ES (p 〈 0. 05). The main reason of ES is lower function. Conclusions Patients were older, with more advanced congestive heart failure,and tended to have lower LVEF when compared with ICD free patients. Deteriorated CHF and anxiety lead to the activation of sympathetic tone enhancing electrical instability. Amiodarone and β-blockers can reduce the ES. Radiofreqnency catheter ablation( RFCA )was a helpful method to reduce ES.
出处 《中华心律失常学杂志》 2009年第2期141-143,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias
关键词 植入型心律转复除颤器 电风暴 室性心律失常 抗心律失常 hnplantable cardioverter defibrillator Electrical storm Ventricular arrhythmia Anti arrhythmia
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al, Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multieenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med, 1996,335: 1933- 1940.
  • 2Exner DV, Pinski SL, Wyse DG. et al, Eleetrical storm presages nonsudden death:the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillatots (AVID) trial. Circulation ,2001,103 : 2066-2071.
  • 3刘杰.埋藏式心脏复律除颤器的电风暴研究进展[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2002,16(4):307-309. 被引量:14
  • 4Verma A, Kilicaslan F, Marrouche NF, et al, Prevalence, predictors,and mortality significance of the causative arrhythmia in patients with electrical storm. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2004,15: 1265-1270.
  • 5Arya A, Haghjoo M, Dehghani MR, et al. Prevalence and predictors of electrical storm in patients with implantahle cardioverter-defibrillator. Am J Cardiol,2006,97:389-392.
  • 6Credner SC, Klingenheben T, Mauss O,et al Electricalstorm in patients with transvenous implantablc c.ardioverter-defibrillators: incidence,management and prognostic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998,32 : 1909-1915.
  • 7Kudenchuk PJ,CobbLA,Copass MK, et al . Amiodarone for resuscitation after out-of -hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med, 1999,341:871-878.
  • 8Nademanee K, Taylor R, Bailey WE, et al. Treating electrical storm: sympathetic blockade versus advanced cardiac life supportguided therapy. Circulation, 2000,102 : 742 -747.
  • 9Dijkman B,den Dulk K, Wellens HJ. Manngement of electrical instability after ICD implantation. PACE, 1995,18: 148-151.
  • 10郭成军,张英川,阎方明,方冬平,郝蓬,刘冰,何东方,李果.以电风暴为初发表现的冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2005,9(5):332-336. 被引量:18

二级参考文献21

  • 1郭成军,张英川,刘冰,郭晋萍,徐霞,裴莉,陈晖.心室颤动初始节律的动态心电图观察[J].中华心血管病杂志,2004,32(8):689-693. 被引量:23
  • 2郭成军,吕树铮,王天松.希氏-浦肯野系统电冲动与实验性室性心律失常的关系[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2004,18(5):369-373. 被引量:29
  • 3[1]Kowey PR,Levine JH,Herre JM,et al.Randomized,double-blind comparison of intravenous amiodarone and bretylium in the treatment of patients with recurrent,hemodynamically destabilizing ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation[J].Circulation,1995,92:3255
  • 4[2]Scheinman MM,Levine JH,Cannom DS,et al.Dose-ranging study of intravenous amiodarone in patients with life-threatening tachyarrhythmias[J].Circulation,1995,92:3264
  • 5[3]Nademanee K,Taylor R,Bailey WE,et al.Treating electrical storm.Sympathetic blockade versus advanced cardiac life support-guided therapy[J].Circulation,2000,102:742
  • 6[4]Credner SC,Klingenheben T,Mauss O,et al.Electrical storm in patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.Incidence,management and prognostic implications[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1998,32:1909
  • 7[5]Exner DV,Pinski SL,Wyse DG,et al.Electrical storm presages nonsudden death.The antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial[J].Circulation,2001,103:2066
  • 8[6]Wood MA,Simpson PM,Stambler BS,et al.Long-term temporal patterns of ventricular arrhythmias[J].Circulation,1995,91:2371
  • 9[7]Liebovitch LS,Todorov AT,Zochowski M,et al.Nonlinear scaling properties of cardiac rhythm abnormalities[J].Phys Rev E,1999,59:3312
  • 10[8]Kim SG,Ling J,Fisher JD,et al.Comparison and frequency of ventricular arrhythmias after defibrillator implantation by thoracotomy versus nonthoracotomy approaches[J].Am J Cardiol,1994,74:1245

共引文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部