期刊文献+

继发于危重症的室速风暴及其治疗 被引量:9

Treatment of ventricular tachycardia storm secondary to critical illness
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:观察静脉应用β-受体阻滞剂治疗室速风暴的临床疗效及其安全性。方法:2005年1月~2008年1月我院收治的室速风暴患者41例,随机分为对照组和倍他乐克干预组。其中,对照组26例患者仅于静脉应用利多卡因或胺碘酮基础上采用电复律治疗;倍他乐克干预组15例患者在上述治疗基础上静脉给予倍他乐克。结果:倍他乐克干预组终止反复室速、室颤成功率显著高于对照组(93.33%vs34.61%,P<0.05),终止室速及室颤所需放电次数[(4.27±1.28)次]显著少于对照组[(7.77±3.46)次,(P<0.05)]。倍他乐克干预组房室传导阻滞的发生率显著高于对照组(33.33%vs3.85%,P<0.05)。对照组与倍他乐克干预组低血压(57.69%vs73.33%)及交界性或室性逸搏(61.54%vs73.33%)的发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:对于继发于危重症的反复性室速和室颤应认识到有交感风暴的存在,常规治疗基础上,及时、足量地静脉注射β-受体阻滞剂治疗室速风暴是非常有效而且安全的。 Objective: To evaluate the effect of β-blocker on ventricular tachycardia storm. Methods: 41 patients of ven- tricular tachycardia storm were randomly divided into two groups from January 2005 to January 2008: control group and Betaloc intervention group. Patients in control group were treated with Lidocaine or Amiodaronehydrochloride and electric cardioversion; patients in Betaloc intervention group were intravenously administrated with Betaloc Injection on the basis of the treatment of control group. Results: The success rate of terminating repeated ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation of Betaloc intervention group was significantly higher than that of control group (93.33% vs 34.61%, P〈0.05), and its necessary discharge times of terminating ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were considerably decreased than those in control group (4.27±1.28 vs 7.77±3.46, P〈0.05). The incidence of atrioventricular block in Betaloc intervention group was markedly increased compared with that in control group (33.33% vs 3.85%, P〈0.05). No significant difference was found in the incidence of hypotension(57.69% vs 73.33%), A-V junctional escape rhythm or ventricular es- cape rhythm (61.54% vs 73.33%) in patients of both groups (P〉0.05). Conclusion: It is important to be aware of the exis- tence of ventricular tachycardia storm secondary to critical illness. On the basis of conventional treatment, intravenous ad- ministration of β-blocker injection is a safe and effective therapy to ventricular tachycardia storm.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2008年第31期10-12,共3页 China Medical Herald
关键词 Β-受体阻滞剂 室性心动过速 心室颤动 交感风暴 β-blocker Ventricular tachycardia Ventricular fibrillation Catecholamine storin
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]Zipes D,Camm AJ,Borggrefe M,et al.ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sadden caniiac death[J].JACC,2006,48(5):e2A7-346.
  • 2[2]Kim SG,Ling J,Fisher JD,et al.Comparison and frequency of ventricular arrhythmias after defibrillator implantation by thorocotomy versus nonthoracotomy approaches[J].AmJ Cardiol,1994,74:1245.
  • 3刘杰.埋藏式心脏复律除颤器的电风暴研究进展[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2002,16(4):307-309. 被引量:14
  • 4郭继鸿.β受体阻滞剂应当成为快速心律失常治疗的基础用药[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2005,19(5):331-334. 被引量:79
  • 5[6]Nademanee K,Taylor R,Bailey WE,et al.Treating electrical storm.sympathetic blockade versus advanced cardiac life rapport guided thempy[J].Circulation,2000,102:742.
  • 6[7]Tavernier R,Derycke E,Jordaens L,et al.An arrhythmia storm dependency on adrenergic drive late after implantation of an internal cardioverter defibrillator[J].Eut JCPE,1997,1:33.

二级参考文献14

  • 1[1]Kowey PR,Levine JH,Herre JM,et al.Randomized,double-blind comparison of intravenous amiodarone and bretylium in the treatment of patients with recurrent,hemodynamically destabilizing ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation[J].Circulation,1995,92:3255
  • 2[2]Scheinman MM,Levine JH,Cannom DS,et al.Dose-ranging study of intravenous amiodarone in patients with life-threatening tachyarrhythmias[J].Circulation,1995,92:3264
  • 3[3]Nademanee K,Taylor R,Bailey WE,et al.Treating electrical storm.Sympathetic blockade versus advanced cardiac life support-guided therapy[J].Circulation,2000,102:742
  • 4[4]Credner SC,Klingenheben T,Mauss O,et al.Electrical storm in patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.Incidence,management and prognostic implications[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1998,32:1909
  • 5[5]Exner DV,Pinski SL,Wyse DG,et al.Electrical storm presages nonsudden death.The antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial[J].Circulation,2001,103:2066
  • 6[6]Wood MA,Simpson PM,Stambler BS,et al.Long-term temporal patterns of ventricular arrhythmias[J].Circulation,1995,91:2371
  • 7[7]Liebovitch LS,Todorov AT,Zochowski M,et al.Nonlinear scaling properties of cardiac rhythm abnormalities[J].Phys Rev E,1999,59:3312
  • 8[8]Kim SG,Ling J,Fisher JD,et al.Comparison and frequency of ventricular arrhythmias after defibrillator implantation by thoracotomy versus nonthoracotomy approaches[J].Am J Cardiol,1994,74:1245
  • 9[9]O′Donoghue S,Platia EV,Waclawski S,et al.Transient electrical storm: prognostic significance of very numerous automatic defibrillator discharges[abstract][J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1991,17:352A
  • 10[10]Greene M,Geist M,Paquette M,et al.Long-term follow-up of implantable defibrillator therapy in patients with electrical storm(abstract)[J].PACE,1997,20:1207

共引文献91

同被引文献52

  • 1郭成军,吕树铮,阎方明,姜腾勇,李海宴,张金荣.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗防治冠心病无心肌梗死患者的电风暴[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(9):806-809. 被引量:39
  • 2郭继鸿.β受体阻滞剂应当成为快速心律失常治疗的基础用药[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2005,19(5):331-334. 被引量:79
  • 3郭成军,张英川,阎方明,方冬平,郝蓬,刘冰,何东方,李果.以电风暴为初发表现的冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2005,9(5):332-336. 被引量:18
  • 4郭继鸿.β受体阻滞剂在心律失常治疗中的应用[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2007,21(1):4-6. 被引量:49
  • 5张萍.交感风暴[J].临床心电学杂志,2007,16(1):74-75. 被引量:51
  • 6Zipes D,Camm AJ,Borggrefe Met al. ACC/AHA/EAC2006 Guidelines for Martagement of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. ACC,2006,48(5) :27-34.
  • 7Zipes D, Camm A J, Borggrefe M, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden death[J]. JACC, 2006,48(5): e247.
  • 8Zipes D,Camm AJ,Borggrefe M,et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death[J]. JACC,2006,48(5):e247-346.
  • 9Kim SG,Ling J,Fisher JD,et al. Comparison and frequency of ventricular arrhythmias after defibrillator implantation by thoracotomy versus nonthoracotomy approaches[J]. Am J Cardiol,1994,74(12):1245.
  • 10Incidence and short- term prognosis of late sustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: Results of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio delia Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico(GISSI- 3)Data Base[J]. J AmHeart,2001,142(1):87-92.

引证文献9

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部