摘要
本文以生态足迹理论为基础,对我国2006年各地区生态足迹的差异进行比较研究。分析表明:①2006年全国人均生态足迹为1.22,由东向西逐渐递减。东部经济发达省区生物资源生态足迹显著高于中西部经济相对落后地区;能源丰富的省区,能源消费足迹对人均生态足迹贡献明显。②东部地区,生物资源、能源消费以及人均生态足迹绝对值普遍较高,且生物资源生态足迹对人均生态足迹的贡献率普遍高于能源生态足迹;在中西部地区,两者对人均生态足迹的贡献率相当,但西部各省区的生物资源生态足迹与能源生态足迹的绝对值普遍较低。③2006年全国的生态赤字较为严重,达到0.72。中西部地区生态承载力明显高于东部,由东向西呈递增趋势。④可持续发展水平表现为东部<中部<西部。
According to the ecological footprint theory, a comparative study was maked on the differences of ecological footprint to China＇s regional. The results showed that： （1）the country＇s per capita ecological footprint is 1.22 in 2006. From east to west, it showed a clear trend of diminishing. The values of the eastern provinces and autonomous regions with economically developed, to the ecological footprint of biological resources, is significant higher than the central and western regions with relatively backward of economy; the contribution is significantly to the footprint of energy consumption in the energy-rich provinces and autonomous regions for the ecological footprint of energy. （2）In the eastern region, the absolute value of the ecological footprint is relatively high and the contribution rate which comes from ecological footprint of biological resources is generally higher than the ecological footprint of energy to per capita ecological footprint; in the central and western regions, the contribution rate which comes from bio-ecological footprint is well-matched with the ecological footprint of energy on the ecological footprint per capita ecological footprint, but the absolute value of the ecological footprint of biological resources, energy consumption, as well as ecological footprint per capita ecological footprint is relatively low in the central and westem regions, which match with the living standards in line with the pattern in modem times. （3）At the same time, the deficit of ecological of china is more serious in 2006 which is 0.7. The ecological carrying capacity of the central and western regions is significantly higher than the eastern provinces and autonomous regions which increases from east to west.（4） The level of sustainable development among regions is that： eastern region 〈central region〈western region.
出处
《农业现代化研究》
CSCD
北大核心
2009年第3期356-359,共4页
Research of Agricultural Modernization
基金
四川大学"中国城镇新农村建设研究项目(2007-03)"
关键词
生态足迹
地区差异
可持续发展
ecological footprint
region differences
sustainable development.
