期刊文献+

不礼貌言语行为的顺应性研究 被引量:16

An interpretation of impolite speech acts in the light of AT
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 将不礼貌言语行分为表面不礼貌言语行为、实质不礼貌言语行为、有意识不礼貌言语行为和无意识不礼貌言语行为。在此分类的基础上,运用索绪尔的"顺应理论"对不礼貌言语行为的产生和导致的结果进行分析和解释。认为,无论是哪一种不礼貌言语行为,都是说话人努力顺应交际需要的结果,不同在于有些不礼貌言语行为顺应了交际的需要,而有些不礼貌言语行为则没有真正做到顺应交际的需要。 This paper classifies impolite speech acts into superficial impolite speech acts, actual impolite s.peech acts, intentional impolite speech acts, and unintentional impolite speech acts. Based on this new classification of impolite speech acts, this paper tries to approach impolite speech acts from the perspective of Verschueren's Adaptation Theory, holding that impolite speech acts, whatever type they fall into, are a result of speaker's attempt to meet the need of communication and that the only difference lies in that they are either the result of successful adaptation or failed one.
作者 王传奔
出处 《安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第1期64-68,共5页 Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Social Science
关键词 不礼貌言语行为 语境 语言结构 动态顺应 意识程度 impolite speech acts context structure dynamics salience
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Grice H.Logic and Conversation[M]//Cole P and Morgan J.Syntax and semantics 3:Speech Acts.New York:Academic Press,1975:41-58.
  • 2Brown P & S.Levinson.Universals in Language Usage:Politeness Phenomena[M]//Googdy E.Questions And Politeness:Strategies in Social Interaction.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1978.
  • 3Brown P & S.Levinson.Politeness:Some Universals in Language Usage[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1978.
  • 4Leech G.Principles of Pragmatics[M].London:Longman,1983.
  • 5Verschueren,Jef.Understanding Pragmatics[M].Shanghai:Foreign Language Education press,2000.
  • 6Mills,SARA.Gender and Politeness[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003:121-163.
  • 7Kienpointner M.Varieties of rudeness:types and functions of impolite utterances[J].Functions of language,1997,4(2):251-87.
  • 8Austin P.Politeness revisited:the dark side[M]//Bell A and Holmes J(eds.).New Zealand Ways of Speaking English.Clevedon:Multilingual mATTERS,1990:277-293.
  • 9Baumann R.Christ respects no man's person:the plain language of the early quakers and the rhetoric of impoliteness[C].Sociolinguistic Working Paper.University of Texas,Austin,TX,1981.
  • 10Baroni M R and Axia G.Children's meta-pragmatic abilities and the identification of polite and impolite requests[J].First Language,1989,9(3):285-97.

二级参考文献4

共引文献195

同被引文献108

引证文献16

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部