贸易与道德：中美文化产品争端的法律分析被引量：21

Trade and Morality:A Legal Analysis of Sino-US Disputes on Cultural Products

导出

摘要中美文化产品争端由来已久。美国认为中国相关措施违反了WTO协定下的义务,中国则以保护"公共道德"为由进行抗辩。在WTO语境之下,保护"公共道德"的有关措施在"性质"和"实施"两个方面受到严格限制,这使得中国援引"公共道德"例外困难重重。尽管中国的文化产品管理方式可能受到WTO约束,但仍将继续拥有决定"公共道德"实质内容的权力。 The disputes between China and the United States on cultural products can be traced back many years. The US contends that the relevant measures taken by China have violated China's obligations under the WTO agreement, while China has turned to the protection of 'public morals' to defend itself. The protection of 'public morals' is one of the cases justified by the general exception clause under the WTO. However, measures in the name of protecting 'public morals' are subject to strict limitations with regard to their 'nature' and 'application,' making it difficult for China to resort to the exclusion clause of 'public morals.' Despite the fact that the way China manages its cultural products may possibly be subject to WTO restrictions, China still has the power to determine the substance of 'public morals.'

作者彭岳

机构地区南京大学法学院讲师

出处《中国社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期136-148,共13页 Social Sciences in China

关键词贸易与道德文化产品争端公共道德例外 WT0解释方法

分类号 D996.1 [政治法律—经济法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献95

1WT/DS363/1, G/L/820, S/L/287, April 16, 2007.
2WT/DS363/1/Add. 1, G/L/820/Add.1, S/L/287/Add. 1, July 16, 2007.
3WT/DS363/5, October 11, 2007.
4Protocol on the Accession of the PRC, WT/L/432 (November 23, 2001), http://www, ustr. gov/assets/ Document _ Library/Reports _ Publications/2006/asset_ upload _ file688 _ 10223. pdf, January 5, 2009.
5WT/L/432/, Annex 9, and WT/MIN (01)/3/Add.2.
6USTR, 2006 Report to Congress on China's WTO Compliance (December 11, 2006).
7Nicolas F. Diebold, The Morals and Order Exceptions in WTO Law: Balancing the Toothless Tiger and the Undermining Mole, Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 11, no. 1, 2008, p. 43.
8《加入议定书》第1.2条.
9Appellate Body Report on US-Shrimp, para. 156.
10Christoph T, Feddersen, Focusing on Substantive Law in International Economic Relations: The Public Morals of GATT's Article XX (a) and 'Conventional' Rules of Interpretation, Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, vol. 7 (Winter 1998), p. 75.

二级参考文献79

1[美]约翰·罗尔斯何怀宏等译.《正义论》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1988年版.第96页.
2[古希腊]亚里士多德吴寿彭.《政治学》[M].商务印书馆,1996年.第104页.
3[德]黑格尔贺辟译.《法哲学原理》[M].商务印书馆,1961年版.第99-100页.
4李浩培著.《条约法概论》[M].法律出版社,1997年版.第384页.
5A. G. vip, Chitty on Contracts, Sweet ＆Maxwell, London, 1977, p. 695.
6Panel Report on Canada-Pharmaceutical Patents,para.7.14.
7Appellate Body Report on US-Shrimp,para.158.
8(footnote original)B.Cheng.General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals(Stevens and Sons,Ltd.,1953),Chapter 4,in particular.
9Appellate Body Report on US-Foreign Sales Corporation,para.166.
10Appellate Body Report on India—Patents(US),para.84.