期刊文献+

华蟾素联合希罗达治疗晚期消化道恶性肿瘤 被引量:11

Cinobufacini with xeloda in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:观察华蟾素注射液联合希罗达治疗晚期消化道恶性肿瘤的疗效。方法:将患者随机分为两组,治疗组30例采用华蟾素注射液20ml+5%葡萄糖500ml,静滴,每日1次,连用15天;希罗达1g-1.5g,每日两次,口服,连用14天。对照组30例用希罗达1g-1.5g,1日两次,口服,连用14天。21天为1周期,共用2周期。结果:治疗组有效率为53.3%,疼痛缓解率为63.3%;对照组有效率46.7%,疼痛缓解率为56.7%;两组相比治疗组优于对照组,但差异未达显著性(P>0.05)。治疗组生活质量改善率为73.3%,白细胞下降率为16.8%;对照组生活质量改善率为26.7%,白细胞下降率为46.7%;两组相比均有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:华蟾素注射液配合希罗达治疗晚期消化道恶性肿瘤能明显缓解症状,改善生活质量,疗效确切。 Objective:To study the effect of cinobufacini toad-injection with xeloda for advanced gastrointestinal cancer.Methods: Sixty patients were randomly divided into two groups treatment group(30 cases)using cinobufacini injection 20ml +5% glucose infusion 500 ml ivgtt,once a day,for 15 days,xeloda 1g-1.5g,twice daily,for 14 days.The control group(30 cases) treated with xeloda 1g-1.5g,for 14 days.Results: Effective rate in the treatment group was 53.3%,pain remission rate 63.3%;effective rate in the control group was 46.7%,pain remission rate 56.7%(P〉 0.05).The rate of improving the quality of life in the treatment group was 73.3%,drop of white blood 16.8%;but for control group was 26.7% and 46.7%(P〈0.05).Conclusion: Cinobufacini injection with xeloda for advanced gastrointestinal cancer can significantly improve the symptoms,and quality of life of the patients.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2009年第3期498-499,共2页 Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词 华蟾素注射液 消化道恶性肿瘤 化疗 希罗达 cinobufacini injection gastrointestinal cancer chemotherapy xeloda
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1韩鸿彬,陈嘉勇.华蟾素抗肿瘤作用及其机制的研究进展[J].中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志,2005,12(2):160-162. 被引量:49
  • 2王昕,苑凤芹.华蟾素治疗原发性肝癌的临床疗效观察[J].实用中医内科杂志,2005,19(4):379-379. 被引量:11
  • 3范健,滕皋军,何仕成,郭金和,翁帼英.原发性肝癌的肝肿瘤动脉化疗栓塞[J].中华消化杂志,1996,16(6):339-341. 被引量:10
  • 4WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment [M].Geneva (Switzerland):World Health Organization,1979.
  • 5Duffaud F,Therasse P.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors[J].Bull Cancer,2000,87(12):869-870.
  • 6James K,Eisenhauer E,Christian M,et al.Measuring response in solid tumors:unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,1999,91(6):523-528.
  • 7Mazumdar M,Smith A,Schwartz LH.A statistical simulation study finds discordance between WHO criteria and RECIST guideline[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2004,57(4):358-365.
  • 8Therasse P,Arbuck SG,Eisenhauer EA,et al.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors [J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92(3):179-181.
  • 9Werner-Wasik M,Xiao Y,Pequignot E,et al.Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy:tumor diameter,bidimensional product,and volume.A serial CT sean-based study[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2001,51(1):56-61.
  • 10Prasad SR,Saini S,Sumner JE,et al.Radiological measurement of breast cancer metastases to lung and liver:comparison between WHO (bidimensional) and RECIST (unidimensional) guidelines [J].J Comput Assist Tomogr,2003,27(3):380-384.

共引文献221

同被引文献110

引证文献11

二级引证文献109

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部