期刊文献+

嗓音疾病自我评估特点及影响因素 被引量:20

Self-assessment characteristics of voice handicap index for voice disorders and its influencing factors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨嗓音障碍疾病嗓音障碍自我评估特点及影响因素。方法对1766例嗓音障碍患者及120例健康对照者行嗓音障碍指数(voice handicap index,VHI)量表评估,并对其中227例嗓音治疗后效果进行评估。结果各种嗓音疾病患者VHI评分均明显高于对照组(z值范围8.039—17.043,P值均为0.000)。不同嗓音疾病患者之问评分也有差异,量表总分自高而低依次为痉挛性发音障碍、声带麻痹、功能性发音障碍、声带沟、声带良恶性肿瘤、声带囊肿、声带任克水肿、声带息肉、声带角化与慢性喉炎、声带小结。痉挛性发音障碍组情感部分评分最高,其次为功能性发音障碍,而其他组生理部分评分均高于功能及情感评分。嗓音治疗后患者量表评分显著下降,术前术后VHI量表总评分差异有统计学意义(P值均〈0.05)。不同教育程度、年龄分组间量表总分差异有统计学意义(F值范围8.701—27.371,P值均为0.000),受教育程度越高,VHI评分越高;少年组VHI的各项最低,青年组最高,之后随年龄增长VHI逐渐下降。结论VHI量表评估作为嗓音疾病严重程度及治疗效果评估的有益补充,可以从患者角度通过生理、机能及情感三方面综合评估嗓音障碍对日常生活影响及治疗前后变化,但具有一定主观性,可能受到教育程度及年龄因素影响。 Objective To investigate the self-assessment characteristics of Voice Handicap Index (VHI) for voice disorders and its influencing factors. Methods One thousand seven hundred and sixty six dysphonic patients and 120 control subjects were included in this study. Two hundred twenty seven patients were treated with phonosurgery or Botulinumtoxin injection. VHI was used for self-assessment. Results Dysphonic patients had worse VHI scores than control (z from 8.039 to 17. 043, P =0. 000). There was a significant difference among the VHI scores of different diseases. VHI scores were descending in order among spasmodic dysphonia, vocal fold paralysis, functional dysphoina, sulcus vocalis, benign and malignant tumor of vocal fold, vocal fold cyst, Reinke' s edema, vocal fold polyp, vocal fold keratosis and chronic laryngitis, vocal nodule. The emotional scores were the highest in spasmodic dysphonia, and followed by functional dysphoina. In another group, the physical scores were higher than functional scores and emotional scores. Treatment resulted in statistical improvement in VHI scores ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The total scores were different significantly between different educational background and age groups ( F from 8. 701 to 27. 371, P = 0. 000). The higher the educational degree, the higher the VHI scores. As to age groups, the juvenile group' s scores were the lowest, while the youth' s group the highest, then the scores declined when ages increased. Conclusion As a useful supplementary instrument to measure the voice disorder severity and the treatment' s effect, VHI can comprehensively assess the voice handicap' s affect to the life quality and the difference after the treatment, especially in physical, functional and emotional aspects, but it is somehow subject to the educational degree and age.
出处 《中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期109-113,共5页 Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
关键词 语音障碍 生活质量 疾病严重程度指数 Voice disorders Quality of life Severity of illness index
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, et al. The voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 1997, 6: 66-70.
  • 2徐文,李红艳,胡蓉,胡慧英,侯丽珍,张丽,庄佩耘,韩德民.嗓音障碍指数量表中文版信度和效度评价[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2008,43(9):670-675. 被引量:164
  • 3Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Van de Heyning PH. Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia. J Voice, 1999, 13:508-517.
  • 4Lain PK, Chart KM, Ho WK, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese Voice Handicap Index-10. Laryngoscope, 2006, 116 : 1192-1198.
  • 5Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, et al. Development and validation of the voice handieap index-10. Laryngoscope, 2004, 114: 1549-1556.
  • 6Hsiung MW, Lu P, Kang BH, et al. Measurement and validation of the voice handicap index in voice-disordered patients in Taiwan. J Laryngol Otol, 2003, 117 : 478-481.
  • 7Amir O, Ashkenazi O, Leibovitzh T, et al. Applying the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) to dysphonic and nondysphonic Hebrew speakers. J Voice, 2006, 20: 318-324.
  • 8Guimaraes I, Abberton E. An investigation of the Voice Handicap Index with speakers of Portuguese: prehminary data. J Voice, 2004, 18: 71-82.
  • 9Zur KB, Cotton S, Kelchner L, et al. Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI) : a new tool for evaluating pediatric dysphonia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinalaryngol, 2007, 71 : 77-82.
  • 10Spector BC, Netterville JL, Billante C, et al. Quality-of-life assessment in patients with unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2001, 125 : 176-182.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, et al. The Voice Handicap Index ( VHI ) : development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 1997, 6:66-70.
  • 2Lam PK, Chan KM, Ho WK, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese Voice Handicap Index-10. Laryngoscope, 2006, 116:1192-1198.
  • 3Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, et al. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope, 2004, 114: 1549-1556.
  • 4Hsiung MW, Lu P, Kang BH, et al. Measurement and validation of the voice handicap index in voice-disordered patients in Taiwan. J Laryngol Otol, 2003, 117:478-481.
  • 5Amir O, Ashkenazi O, Leibovitzh T, et al. Applying the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) to dysphonic and nondysphonic Hebrew speakers. J Voice, 2006, 20:318-324.
  • 6Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432.
  • 7Guimaraes I, Abberton E. An investigation of the Voice Handicap Index with speakers of Portuguese: preliminary data. J Voice, 2004, 18:71-82.
  • 8Hakkesteegt MM, Wieringa MH, Gerritsma E J, et al. Reproducibility of the Dutch version of the Voice Handicap Index. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 2006, 58 : 132-138.

共引文献163

同被引文献204

引证文献20

二级引证文献232

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部