期刊文献+

Procrusts重叠以及多元统计应用于安氏Ⅱ类错颅面分类的研究 被引量:3

Craniofacial characters for Angle's class Ⅱ malocclusion using Procrusts superimposition and multivariate statistics
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:使用Procrusts标准化以及聚类分析、判别分析方法对安氏Ⅱ类错[牙合]颅面形态进行分析,初步探讨使用形态测量以及多元统计对错[牙合]进行分类的方法。方法:收集北京大学13腔医学院·口腔医院正畸科1997~2000年就诊的安氏Ⅱ类错[牙合]患者894名,通过影像测量及最小平方和重叠法(PS)进行聚类分析以及亚型划分,并利用判别分析判别聚类分析准确性,建立判别方程,为今后新样本的分类和治疗后样本颅面形态的变化研究打下基础。结果:将样本头颅侧位片进行Procrusts标准化后,使用聚类分析将其分出11个具有各自形态特征的类型。建立3个判别方程,交互验证准确率为80.17%。结论:Ps重叠法用于形态学分类具有一定的优势;利用聚类分析,可以对安氏Ⅱ类错[牙合]进行进一步的划分;对于不同类别,判别的准确率有所不同;判别方程的建立为今后新样本以及治疗后样本分型的研究打下基础。 Objective:Cluster and discriminant analysis of the morphological characters of Angle's Class Ⅱ malocclusion was performed using Procrusts standardization. The classification of craniofacial morphology with the help of morphometry and multivariate statistics was also discussed. Methods: A total of 894 class Ⅱ patients were collected from the orthodontic department, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology during 1997 -2000. Using Procrusts standardization and cluster analysis, the samples were divided into different groups, discrimination equations were then established. Results: The samples were divided into Ⅱ subdivisions by Procrusts superimposition and cluster analysis. Three discrimination equations were established. The accuracy rate of cross-validated grouped cases was 80. 17%. Conclusion: Procrusts standardization had certain advantages in morphological classification; cluster analysis could be used in classification of Angle class Ⅱ malocclusion; For different types, the differentiate rate was not the same; the discrimination equations was the foundation for future research.
出处 《北京大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期71-75,共5页 Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划专项经费资助(2001AA111392-3)~~
关键词 错[牙合] 安氏Ⅱ类 聚类分析 判别分析 Malocclusion, Angle class Ⅱ Cluster analysis Discriminant analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1韩冰,许天民.安氏Ⅰ类错[牙合]数字化图形诊断模板的初步探索[J].口腔正畸学,2005,12(4):168-172. 被引量:5
  • 2Lale T,Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,1999年,115卷,508页
  • 3Rohlf F J.Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometrics methods[J].American Journal of Physical Anthropology,2000,111:463-478.
  • 4Lavelle CL.A study of mandibular shape[J].British Journal of Orthodontics,1984,11:69-74.
  • 5Grant TM,Peter AM.Size and shape measurement in contemporary cephalometrics[J].European Journal of Orthodontics,2003,25:231-242.
  • 6Battagel JM.A comparative assessment of cephalometric errors[J].European Journal of Orthodontics,1993,15:305-314.
  • 7Hennessy RJ,Moss JP.Facial growth:separating shape from size[J].European Journal of Orthodontics,2001,23:275-285.
  • 8Richtsmeier JT,Cheverud JM.Finite element scaling analysis of human craniofacial growth[J].Journal of Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology,1986,6:289-323.
  • 9Lestrel PE.Some approaches toward the mathematical modeling of the craniofacial complex[J].Journal of Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology,1989,9:77-91.
  • 10Cheverud JL,Bachrach W,Lew W D.The measurement of form and variation in form[J].American Journal of Physical Anthropology,1983,62:151-163.

共引文献78

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部