期刊文献+

青藏铁路沿线唐古拉山口土壤微生物的ARDRA分析 被引量:7

Soil microbial ARDRA analysis of Tanggula Mountain Pass along the Qinghai-Tibet railway
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过构建16S rDNA文库及文库的限制性片段长度多态性分析(ARDRA),对青藏铁路沿线唐古拉山口的土壤微生物多样性进行了研究。采用限制性内切酶HaeIII和RsaI对克隆文库中的90个克隆子进行了酶切分型,根据ARDRA酶切图谱的不同,可将其分为23个OTUs。16SrDNA序列分析结果表明,该克隆文库中主要包括变形菌门(Proteobacteria)的alpha、beta、detla亚类、厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)、放线菌门(Actinobacteria)、拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)、酸杆菌门(Acidobacteria)及浮霉菌门(Planctomycetes)等8类细菌及未培养细菌。Alpha变形细菌为该文库中的主要菌群,占克隆总数的33.3%;其次为未培养细菌,占克隆总数的22.2%,Bradyrhizobium为优势菌属。研究结果揭示,青藏铁路唐古拉山口的土壤微生物种群不仅具有丰富的多样性,还存在丰富的潜在新菌种。 The soil microbial diversity of Tanggula Mountain Pass along the Qinghai-Tibet railway was analyzed by 16S rDNA cloning, amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis ( ARDRA), and sequence homology comparisons. Among 90 positive clones in the 16S rDNA library of microorganisms, 23 OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units) were identified based on the similarity of the ARDRA banding profiles. Sequence analysis revealed diverse phyla of bacteria in the 16S rDNA library, which consisted of alpha, beta, delta subclasses of the Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria and Planctomycetes. The dominant group was alpha-Proteobacteria (33.3% of the total clones), and the most dominant genus was Bradyrhizobium. More than 22.2% of the total clones showed high similarity to uncultured bacteria. The results suggest that the soil microbial diversity is abundant in this area.
出处 《生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第11期5482-5487,共6页 Acta Ecologica Sinica
基金 铁道部重大科技计划资助项目(2004G009)~~
关键词 青藏铁路 唐古拉山口 微生物 多样性 ARDRA Qinghai-Tibet railway Tanggula Mountain Pass microorganisms population diversity ARDRA
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献59

  • 1张于光,王慧敏,李迪强,肖启明,刘学端.三江源高寒草甸土固氮基因(nifH)的多样性和系统发育研究[J].微生物学报,2005,45(2):166-171. 被引量:20
  • 2[11]Gilichinsky D A, Khlebnikova G M, Zvyagintsev D G, et al. The use of microbiological characteristics of rocks in geocryology [A]. Proc 5th Int Conf Permafrost, part 2 [C].Norway.Tapir, Trondheim, 1988.749-753.
  • 3[12]Gilichinsky D A,Khlebnikova G M, Zvyagintsev D G, et al. Microbiology of sedimentary materials in the permafrost zone[J]. Int Geol Rev, 1989, 31: 847-858.
  • 4[13]Gilichinsky D A,Vorobyova E A, Erokhina L G, et al. Long-term preservation of microbial ecosystems in permafrost[J]. Adv Space Res, 1992, 12: 255-263.
  • 5[14]Gilichinsky D A. Viable microorgnisms in permafrost:the spectrum of possible applications to new investigations in science for cold regions[A]. IX International Symposium on Thermal Engineering and Science for Cold Regions[C]. Hanover, USA, 1993. 211-221.
  • 6[15]Gilichinsky D A,Rivkina E M,Samarkin V A, et al. The microbiological and biogeochemical research in permafrost: palaeoecological implication [J].South China University of Technology, 1993, 1:869-874.
  • 7[16]Khlebnikova G M, Gilichinsky D A, Fedorov-Davydov D G, et al. Quantitative evaluation of microorganisms in permafrost deposits and buried soils[J]. Microbiology, 1990, 59: 106-112.
  • 8[17]Zvyagintsev D G, Gilichinsky D A, Khlebnikova D A, et al. Comparative characteristics of microbial cenoses from permafrost rocks of different age and genesis[J]. Microbiology , 1990, 59: 332-338.
  • 9[18]Zvyagintsev D G, Gilichinsky D A, Blagodatsky S A, et al. Survival time of microorganisms in permanently frozen sedimentary rock and buried soils[J].Microbiology, 1985, 54: 155-163.
  • 10[19]Shi T, Reeves R H. Characterization of viable bacteria from Siberian permafrost by 16S rDNA sequencing [J]. Microb Eco,l 1997, 33:169-179.

共引文献91

同被引文献184

引证文献7

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部