期刊文献+

“家”“国”关联的历史社会学分析——兼论“差序格局”的宏观建构 被引量:61

Historical Sociology Analysis on the "Clan-dynasty" Relationship:With additional discussion on macro construction of "differential mode of association"
原文传递
导出
摘要 "家""国"关联是理解"差序格局"宏观建构的关键,"家""国"之间"移孝作忠"的伦理设计并不能消解"化家为国"的潜在紧张性,直至宋代科举制的完全确立才标志着绅权与皇权相联结的"家""国"同构真正得以确立起来,但"移孝作忠"的伦理形式背后却是绅权依附于皇权的利益共享机制。其中,"家"之诸子均分制与"国"之嫡长子继承制表面上并不一致,实质上却对巩固皇权起到了关键性的作用,此中也正暗含了"外儒内法"的文化传统。 The clan-dynasty relationship is the nucleus of macro construction of Differential Mode of Association. The ethic design for clan and dynasty is translating filial piety to loyalty, while it can't clear up the latent tension of replacing dynasty with clan. With the comprehensive establishment of the imperial examinations system in the Song Dynasty, the synchronous constitution with clan and dynasty by the connection with gentry power and imperial power finally realized. However, behind the ethic form of translating filial piety to loyalty, it is the benefit-share mechanism in which gentry power really depends on imperial power. Furthermore, the average allocation system of household heritage among all sons by clan and the lineal primogeniture system by dynasty seem to be inconsistent, but are substantially helpful in strengthening the imperial power, which implies cultural tradition of 'Confucianism Outside and Legalism Inside'.
作者 沈毅
出处 《社会学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期155-173,共19页 Sociological Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献26

共引文献137

引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部