摘要
在德国古典自然法中,人被视为具备理智与意志的伦理人,他是伦理与法律上的主体。普芬道夫与沃尔夫从伦理人概念中推导出自然权利义务理论体系。德国民法学对该理论体系予以批判性地吸收,从而形成古典私权一般理论。权利开始成为民法学的核心范畴,以之为逻辑主线,民法素材被重新整合为一个与传统的法学阶梯式体系迥然有别的潘得克吞式体系。民法体系由此发生基因突变。历史经验表明,民法体系植根于民法学理传统。我国民法典应采用潘得克吞式体系,并对其作必要的改进。
In German classical natural law, human beings are regarded as ethical person with reason and will, and as subjects in ethics and law. Samuel Pufendorf and Christian Wolff deduced from the notion of ethical person a theoretical system of natural rights and duty. German civil law employed this theory with critics and formed general theories of private rights where rights began to be the core category of civil law. Based on this, civil law factors was re - organized as a Pandekten System which is quite different from traditional Institu- te System. Civil law system experienced gene mutation since then. The history shows that civil law system roots in civil law theoretical tradition. The civil code of China should use Pandekten System with improvements.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第6期76-87,共12页
Law and Social Development
基金
国家社科基金青年项目"私权一般理论与民法体系构造模式的关系研究"(07CFX039)
关键词
伦理人
古典自然法
私权一般理论
民法体系
民法典
ethical person
classical natural law
general theories of private rights
civil law system
civil code