期刊文献+

在老年患者股骨粗隆骨折手术中应用腰丛阻滞与硬膜外阻滞的效果比较 被引量:9

Comparison of lumbar plexus block and epidural block for elderly patients undergoing intertrochanteric femoral fracture surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价老年患者股骨粗隆骨折手术应用腰丛阻滞和硬膜外阻滞的麻醉效果、血流动力学变化和肛门排气、膀胱功能恢复情况。方法行单侧股骨粗隆手术的老年患者60例,年龄65—97岁。随机分成腰丛组和硬膜外组(n=30)。分别采用患侧后路腰丛阻滞和腰1~2间隙的硬膜外阻滞。观察阻滞起效时间、麻醉效果、术中输液量、麻醉后1h的血压、心率变化和麻醉恢复情况。结果股神经、股外侧皮神经、隐神经和闭孔神经阻滞的起效时间腰丛组为(2.7±2.0)min、(3.1±3.4)min、(3.7±3.1)min和(3.5±3.3)min,硬膜外组为(13.5±2.1)min、(13.5±2.1)min、(13.5±2.1)min和(13.5±2.1)min,腰丛组均快于硬膜外组(均P〈0.01);腰丛组的术后镇痛时间显著长于硬膜外组[(420±152)min vs(204±44)min](P〈0.01)。硬膜外组阻滞后10~60min的血压均低于麻醉前(均P〈0.01)。腰丛组输液量显著少于硬膜外组[(773±353)ml vs (1483±444)ml](P〈0.01),肛门排气时间显著短于硬膜外组(1.1±0.6h vs 5.9±1.2h)(P〈0.01),硬膜外组发生尿潴留需留置导尿患者显著多于腰丛组(8例vs 0例)(P〈0.01)。二组麻醉效果优良率均为100%,腰丛组优秀20例,良好10例;硬膜外组优秀28例,良好2例,硬膜外组优秀率显著高于腰丛组(P〈0.05)。结论老年患者股骨粗隆骨折手术可以选择腰丛阻滞或硬膜外麻醉,硬膜外阻滞麻醉效果优秀率更高,但腰丛阻滞术后消化系统、泌尿系统功能恢复更快。 Objective To compare the anesthesia efficacy, hemodynamics, recovery of passage of gas by anus and bladder function in elderly patients with operation of intertrochanteric femoral fracture with epidural or lumbar plexus block. Methods Sixty patients with intertrochanteric femoral fracture, aged 65- 97, were randomly divided into 3 equal groups : lumbar plexus group ( Group A, undergoing posterior lumbar plexus block) and epidural group ( Group B, undergoing epidural block at L1-2 interspace). The block onset time, anesthesia efficacy, transfusion amount during operation, blood pressure and heart rate change 1 h after anesthesia, and recovery after anesthesia were observed. Results The block onset time on femoral nerve, lateral cutaneous nerve of thigh, obturator nerve, and saphenous nerve of Group A were (2.7 ± 2.0) min, (3.1 ±3.4) min, (3.5 ±3.3) min, and (3.7 ±3.1 ) min respectively, all significantly shorter than those of Group B [(13.5±2.1) min, (13.5 ±2.1) min, (13.5 ±2.1) min, and (13.5±2.1) min respectively, all P 〈 0.01 ]. The duration of postoperative analgesia of Group A was (420 ± 152) min, significantly longer than that of Group B [ ( 204 ± 44) min, P 〈 0.05 ]. There were no significant differences in the change of blood pressure and heart rate between these 2 groups. The blood pressure decreased significantly 10 -60 min after anesthesia in Group B, and remained stable in Group A. The transfusion amount of Group A was (773 ±353) ml, significantly fewer than that in Group B [ ( 1483 ±444) ml, P 〈 0.01 ]. Passage of gas by anus started( 1.1 ± 0.6)h after operation in Group A, a time significantly shorter than that in Group B (5.9 ±1.2) h, P 〈0.01 ). Urinary retention was seen in 8 patients of Group B, however, no patient in Group A showed incidence of urinary retention (P 〈 0.01 ). Forty-eight patients, 20 in Group A and 28 in Group B got excellent anesthesia effect, and 12 of them, 10 in Group A and 2 in Group B, got relatively good anesthesia (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Both lumbar plexus block and epidural block provide satisfactory anesthetic efficacy for operation of intertrochanteric femoral fracture in elderly patients. Epidural block provide better efficacy, and lumbar plexus block shows faster recovery of digestive system and urinary system after operation.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第37期2614-2617,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
基金 浙江省科技厅资助项目(2005E33015)
关键词 麻醉 腰骶丛 麻醉 硬膜外 老年人 股骨粗隆手术 Anesthesia Lumbosacral plexus Anesthesia,epidural Aged Intertrochanteric femoral fracture surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Pianezza A, Gilbert ML, Minville V, et al. A modified midfemoral approach to the sciatic nerve block: a correlation between evoked motor response and sensory block. Anesth Analg,2007, 105 : 528-530.
  • 2Domingo-Triado V, Selfa S, Martinez F, el al. Ultrasound guidance for lateral midfemoral sciatic nerve block : a prospective, comparative, randomized study. Anesth Analg, 2007, 104 : 1270- 1274.
  • 3Raimer C, Priem K, Wiese AA, et al. Continuous psoas and sciatic block after knee arthroplasty: good effects compared to epidural analgesia or i. v. opioid analgesia: a prospective study of 63 patients. Acta Orthop, 2007, 78:193-200.
  • 4郭献阳,徐旭仲,陈丽梅,金烈烈.序贯法测定患者坐骨神经阻滞起效时间限定的利多卡因半数有效量[J].中华医学杂志,2008,88(9):594-596. 被引量:6
  • 5郭献阳,徐旭仲,陈丽梅,李挺,余微萍.罗哌卡因单用及复合不同浓度利多卡因对坐骨神经起效时间的影响[J].温州医学院学报,2007,37(3):240-243. 被引量:14
  • 6Luber M J, Greengrass R, Vail TP. Patient satisfaction and effectiveness of lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2001, 16: 17-21.
  • 7Ho AM, Karmakar MK. Combined paraverlebral lumbar plexus and parasacral sciatic nerve block for reduction of hip fracture in a patient with severe aortic stenosis. Can J Anaesth, 2002, 49: 946-950.
  • 8李挺,金勉,徐旭仲,卢园园.腰丛-坐骨神经阻滞应用于老年病人下肢手术[J].温州医学院学报,2005,35(5):376-378. 被引量:24
  • 9Faas CL, Acosta FJ, Campbell MD, et al. The effects of spinal anesthesia vs epidural anesthesia on 3 potential postoperative complications: pain, urinary, retention, and mobility following inguinal herniorrhaphy. AANA J, 2002,70:441-447.
  • 10徐仲煌,黄宇光,潘华,陈绍辉,任洪智,叶铁虎,罗爱伦.罗比卡因用于腰丛-坐骨神经联合阻滞的临床观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2002,18(5):235-238. 被引量:128

二级参考文献26

共引文献157

同被引文献75

引证文献9

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部