摘要
学术界认为矿业权是应当自由流转的物权,因而责怪法律的严格限制。实际上法律严格限制的对象是矿产开发权,不是物权性质的矿业权。但学术界关于非涉流转的矿业权又与法律严格限制的对象同一,这能说明法律严格限制的科学性。准确界定权利是自由流转的必要条件,这就要撤销虚无的矿业权,重构为独立的矿产权和矿产开发权。独立于矿产国家所有权和矿产开发权的矿产权,是应当自由流转的物权。同时,法律严格限制矿产开发权流转的规定要分类进行改革。
Academia believes that mining rights should be a flee flow of the property, thus they blame the strict legal restrictions. In fact the strictly limited object of the law is mineral exploitation right instead of mining fight. However academia on mining fight with the same object of the laws strictly limit, which can be restricted by law strictly scientific. To precisely define the right of a flee flow is the necessary condition, thus the nothingness of mineral fight should be removed and an independent of the mineral fight and mineral development right be reconstructed. Mineral right that is independent of national ownership of mineral fight and mineral exploitation should be a free flow of the property. At the same time, the laws which strictly limit the transfer of the mineral development fight need classification reform.
出处
《国土资源科技管理》
2008年第5期52-55,共4页
Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources
关键词
矿业权
矿产权
企业产权
流转
mining right
mineral fight
enterprise property right
flow
