期刊文献+

基于CVM的农民灌溉水价心理承受能力研究 被引量:11

Farmers' psychological bearing capacity of irrigation water price based on contingent valuation method
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为准确把握农民灌溉水价的承受能力,制定合理的灌溉水价,借鉴国内外条件价值评估法理论与研究方法,调查分析了研究区域内农民灌溉水价心理承受能力及其影响因素。结果表明:研究区域内农民家庭主要劳动力人数、耕地面积与灌溉水价心理承受能力有显著相关性,农民认为合理的灌溉水价为587~960元/hm2。 In order to accurately grasp the farmers' bearing capacity of irrigation water price and to make reasonable irrigation water price,the farmers' psychological bearing capacity of irrigation water price and its influencing factors were investigated and analyzed based on the theories and methods of contingent valuation method at home and abroad.The results show that the number of major workforces and the cultivated area of farmers' family significantly correlate with the farmers' psychological bearing capacity,and the reasonable irrigation water price should be 587~960 yuan/hm^2.
出处 《水利经济》 2008年第5期39-41,共3页 Journal of Economics of Water Resources
基金 国家自然科学基金(50679020)
关键词 灌溉水价 条件价值评估法 支付意愿 irrigation water price contingent valuation method payment willingness
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献66

  • 1廖永松,鲍子云,黄庆文.灌溉水价改革与农民承受能力[J].水利发展研究,2004,4(12):29-34. 被引量:16
  • 2毛春梅.农业水价改革与节水效果的关系分析[J].中国农村水利水电,2005(4):2-4. 被引量:42
  • 3王密侠,汪志农,尚虎君,胡笑涛,曹红霞.关中九大灌区农业水价与农户承载力调查研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2005,24(3):1-4. 被引量:17
  • 4陈丹,陈菁,张捷,姜琼.五岸灌区水管理体制研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2005(9):51-53. 被引量:10
  • 5陈丹,陈菁,张捷,姜琼,褚琳琳.灌区农业水价研究的条件价值评估法[J].节水灌溉,2005(5):2-4. 被引量:21
  • 6[11]Bateman I J, Langford I H, Turner R K,et al. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 12:161-179.
  • 7[12]Bonnieux F, Rainelli P. Contingent valuation methodology and the EU institutional framework [A]. In: Bateman I J, Willis K G, eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 585-612.
  • 8[13]Carson R T. Valuation of tropical rainforests: Philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation [J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 24: 15-29.
  • 9[14]Loomis J B, Kent P, Strange L, et al. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey [J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 103-117.
  • 10[15]Jorgenson B S, Wilson M A, Heberlein T A. Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: Attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 36(1): 133-148.

共引文献333

同被引文献98

引证文献11

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部