期刊文献+

论“大知”之作为“中华共识”--兼论余英时“反智论”与中国哲学“大知识论” 被引量:3

On "Great Knowledge" as "Chinese Consensus"——And on "Anti-intellectualism" of YU Ying-shi and "Great Epistemology of Chinese Philosophy"
原文传递
导出
摘要 我们称中国文化各家各派之"共识"为"中华共识",如"太一"、"太极"、"太和"等,均是"中华共识";"大知"、"大仁"、"大勇"等,也是"中华共识"。辨明"大知"之作为"中华共识",在学术及新文化构建上具有重要意义:儒、释、道诸家只有"术"不同,而没有"道"不同;应对西方文化之"知识论"的挑战,我们最好以各家共有之"大知"与"大知识论"为武器。中国哲学中有一个"大知识论",它以不追求"纯粹知识"、不追求"为知识而知识"为根本目标。"大知"与"大知识论"之作为"中华共识",乃是中国哲学家对于人类的最大贡献之一。 In Chinese culture,the concensus between every school of thought is referred to as 'Chinese Concensus',such as 'Oneness'(太一),'Ultimate'(太极),'Supreme Harmony'(太和)and more.'Great Knowledge'(大知),'Great Virtue'(大仁)and 'Great Courage'(大勇)also belong to 'Chinese Concensus'.Taking 'Great knowledge' as 'Chinese Concensus' is of great significance to the building of academics and new culture.This first significance is that the difference among schools of Confucianism,Buddhism and Taoism is only in their 'statecraft'(术),in stead of in their 'principle'(道).The second significance is that it is best for us to utilize 'Great Knowledge' and 'Great Epistemology' as our armanents in response to the challenges of Western Epistemology.Chinese philosophy encompasses 'Great Epistemology',which seeks neither 'pure knowledge' nor 'knowledge for the sake of it' as the root target.
作者 张耀南
出处 《清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期31-38,共8页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 2007年国家社会科学基金资助项目(07BZX039)
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

共引文献27

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部