摘要
目前中国法学界有关法学方法抑或法律方法称谓的争论实际上是一场有关捍卫司法领域法律自足性的争论,虽然两者在"根据法律的"、"司法领域的"、"法律内在视角的"、"在事实与规范之间的"等基本立场都是相同的,但两者所持的法律观明显有差异。需要指出的是,捍卫司法领域法律自足性的立场只能是"法律"的立场,而非"法学"的立场,有关方法称谓争论的背后实际上是在进行着法律观的争论,可见,"方法"称谓的争论所引发的是方法论的争论以及法律观的争论,由此,这场"方法"称谓的争论可能会催生出中国法学流派化的法学研究现象。
At present, a dispute on the adoption of method of jurisprudence or legal method is really one concerning legal view of the self-sufficiency of law in judicial process. Although they have the same grounds concerning ＂by law＂, ＂in judicial process＂, ＂an intrinsic angle of law＂ and ＂between the fact and rule＂, they have a different legal view. What we need to point out is that the ground of defending the selfsufficiency of law in judicial process is ＂by law＂, not ＂by jurisprudence＂. Obviously the dispute of the name of ＂method＂ is initiating a dispute of methodology and legal view, which will possibly expedite the schools of the Chinese legal research.
出处
《求是学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第5期81-86,共6页
Seeking Truth
关键词
法学方法
法律方法
法律自足性
法律观
法学流派化
method of jurisprudence
legal method
self-sufficiency of law
legal view
schools of legal research
