期刊文献+

泡沫碳化硅陶瓷的豚鼠致敏最大值试验 被引量:2

Guinea pig maximinatim test for foam silicon carbon ceramic
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价泡沫碳化硅陶瓷的皮肤致敏作用。方法:按照GB/T16886.10-2000,将30只豚鼠分为试验组、阳性对照组、阴性对照组,采用豚鼠最大值试验,于激发结束后1h,5h,12h,24h,48h,72h观察各组动物皮肤激发情况,并进行记分。结果:阳性对照组所有试验动物在6个观察时间点均出现红斑、水肿反应,阴性对照组在1h,5h2个观察时间点有动物出现红斑反应,试验组在1h,5h,12h有动物出现红斑反应,阳性对照组平均反应值3.383±0.886,阴性对照组平均反应值0.117±0.042,试验组平均反应值0.117±0.014。根据GB/T16886.10-2000标准,要求观察24h,48h,72h致敏率,试验组致敏率为0,属Ⅰ级。结论:试验条件下泡沫碳化硅陶瓷无潜在皮肤致敏性。 Objective: To study the skin sensitization of the foam silicon carbon ceramic. Method: According to the GB / T 16886.10-2000 standard, divide 30 guinea pigs into treatment group, the positive control group and negative control group, using guinea pig maximinatim test,observation and score at 1 h,5 h, 12 h,24 h,48 h,7 2h after the stimulate. Result: The all experiments animal of positive control group appears the redspot dropsy in 6 viewing times, the negative control group has the experimental animal to appear the redspot in 1h, 5h two viewing times, the treatment group has the experimental animal to appear the redspot in 1 h,5 h, 12 h. The average response value of positive control group is 3.383±0.886,the average response value of negative control group is 0.117±0.042, the average response value of treatment group is 0.117± 0.014. According to the GB/T 16886.10-2000 standard,request observes 24 h,48 h,72 h sensitively rate, the treatment group sensitively rate is 0, I level.Conclusion: Foam silicon carbon ceramic does not have the potential of skin sensitization under test condition.
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2008年第7期390-393,共4页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
基金 辽宁省教育厅高等学校科学技术研究项目(20060986)
关键词 泡沫碳化硅 豚鼠最大值试验 皮肤致敏试验 foam silicon carbon: GPMT skin sensitization test
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Chong TIAN Jinsong ZHANG Xiaoming CAO Qiang LIU Wanping HU.High Strength Silicon Carbide Foams and Their Deformation Behavior[J].Journal of Materials Science & Technology,2006,22(2):269-272. 被引量:11
  • 2GB/T16886.10-2000,医疗器械生物学评价,第10部分:刺激与致敏试验[S].北京:标准出版社,2000.
  • 3Magnusson B, Kligman AM. The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test [J]. J Invest Dermatol, 1969,52 (3) : 268-276.
  • 4刘欣,任力敏,贾文英,程琳,史弘道.医用聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶软组织填充剂(奥美定)皮肤致敏研究[J].实用美容整形外科杂志,2001,12(2):72-73. 被引量:2
  • 5ISO 10993-10: 1995,Biologlcal evaluation of medical devices- part10:tests for irritation and sensitization[S]. 1995.10:-15.
  • 6Yanagi M, Hoya M,Mori M,et al. Modified short-term guinea pig sensitization tests for detecting contact allergens as an alternative to the conventional test[J]. Contact Dermatitis, 2001,44 (3):140-145.
  • 7周大昕 薛春霄 李士佐.化学性致敏物皮肤斑贴试验浓度的研究.职业医学,1984,11(1):2-5.
  • 8潘建英,严淑贤,洪新宇,帕它木,沈光祖,金锡鹏.豚鼠皮肤试验4种脱毛方法的比较[J].环境与职业医学,2004,21(6):461-463. 被引量:12
  • 9Wilhelm KP,Surber C, Maibach HI. Effect of sodium lauryl sulfate-induced skin irritation on in vitro percutaneous absorption of four drugs [J]. J Invest Dermatol, 1991,96 (6) : 963-967.
  • 10阙冰玲,邓莹玉,越飞,黄振烈,梁丽燕,黄建勋,唐小江.豚鼠最大值试验的方法学改进探讨[J].中国职业医学,2005,32(2):31-34. 被引量:6

二级参考文献31

  • 1任道凤,安平,蒋学之,金锡鹏.洗衣粉对皮肤致敏作用的研究[J].卫生毒理学杂志,1989,3(1):49-50. 被引量:1
  • 2[1]P.Sepulveda and J.G.P.Binner:J.Eur.Ceram.Soc.,1999,19,2059.
  • 3[2]R.T.Smith,R.M.Sambrook and J.G.P.Binner:Mater.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc.,1995,371,279.
  • 4[3]I.Nettleship:Key Eng.Mater.,1996,122-124,305.
  • 5[4]J.Saggio-Woyansky,C.E.Scott and W.P.Minnear:Am.Ceram.Soc.Bull.,1992,71,1674.
  • 6[5]O.Pickenaker,K.Pickenaker and K.Wawrzinek:Interceram,1999,48(5),326.
  • 7[6]Zhenming YANG,Jinsong ZHANG and Xiaoming CAO:Appl.Catal.B:Environ.,2001,34,129.
  • 8[7]Shujing XIE,Xiaoming CAO,Jinsong ZHANG,Shu LI and Yang LIU:Tribology,2003,23,86.
  • 9[8]H.X.Peng,Z.Fan and J.R.G.Evans:Mater.Sci.Eng.,2001,A303,3795.
  • 10[9]X.Bao,M.R.Nagrejo and M.J.Edirrisinghe:J.Mater.Sci.,2000,35,4365.

共引文献27

同被引文献35

  • 1中华人民共和国科学技术部.关于善待实验动物的指导性意见.2006.09-30
  • 2Robinson MK,Fletcher ER,Johnson GR,et al.Value of the cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity (CBH) response for distinguishing weak contact sensitization from irritation reactions in the guinea pig.J Invest Dermatol.1990;94(5):636-643.
  • 3Dvorak HF,Dvorak AM,Simpson BA,et al.Cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity.Ⅱ.A light and electron microscopic description.J Exp Med.1970;132(3):558-582.
  • 4Cadosch D,Chan E,Gautschi OP,et al.Titanium IV ions induced human osteoclast differentiation and enhanced bone resorption in vitro.J Biomed Mater Res A.2009;91(1):29-36.
  • 5Hallab N J,Jacobs JJ.Biologic effects of implant debris.Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis.2009;67(2):182-188.
  • 6Lacey DC,De Kok B,Clanchy FI,et al.Low dose metal particles can induce monocyte/macrophage survivaI.J Orthop Res.2009;27(11):1481-1486.
  • 7Yang SY,Yu H,Gong W,et al.Murine model of prosthesis failure for the long-term study of aseptic loosening.J Orthop Res.2007;25(5):603-611.
  • 8Nagels J,Stokdijk M,Rozing PM.Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty.J Shoulder Elbow Surg.2003;12(1):35-39.
  • 9Mastrokalos DS,Paessler HH.Allergic reaction to biodegradable interference poly-L-lactic acid screws after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.Arthroscopy.2008;24(6):732-733.
  • 10Warden WH,Chooljian D,Jackson DW.Ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up of bioabsorbable poly-L-lactic acid interference screws after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Arthroscopy.2008;24(3):370.e1-3.

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部