期刊文献+

颅内动脉瘤的CE-MRA和DSA对照研究 被引量:6

Comparative Study Between CE-MRA and DSA in Detection for Intracranial Aneurysm
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:通过与DSA比较,评价增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)在颅内动脉瘤诊断中的临床应用价值。材料和方法:对85例临床怀疑有颅内动脉瘤的病人行CE-MRA检查,随后1周内行DSA造影。CE-MRA采用透视触发技术和三维小角度激发快速梯度回波序列,行增强前、增强后动脉期和静脉期3次扫描,图像减影后行三维重建,重建图像包括MIP、VR和MPR,比较CE-MRA与常规DSA对颅内动脉瘤的显示。结果:发现65例病人共69个动脉瘤,CE-MRA诊断动脉瘤的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为98.5%、85%、95.5%,CE-MRA上能够准确测量动脉瘤大小与瘤颈宽度,与DSA测值无统计学差异。对于瘤内血栓的显示,CE- MRA更优于DSA。结论:无创CE-MRA能有效的诊断颅内动脉瘤,所提供的三维信息对指导临床治疗方案的选择具有极大帮助。 Purpose: To evaluated the clinical value of contrast - enhanced MR angiography in the detection for intracranial aneurysm by comparing with DSA. Materials and Methods : CE - MRA was performed in 85 patients suspected with intracranial aneurysms.M1 patients received DSA within the same week. CE - MRA used fluoroscopic triggering technique and three - dimensional fast low angle shot (3D FLASH) sequence were used for CE - MRA. Scan repeated three times (pre - contrast, arterial phase and venous phase), the source images were subtracted and transferred to computer workstation using 3D reconstructed, reconstruction images include MIP, VR and MPR. CE - MRA images and conventional DSA images were compared for demonstration of the aneurysms. Results: There were 65 cases with 69 intracranial aneurysms. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CE - MRA were 98.5% , 85% and 95.5%, respectively. The sizes and necks of aneurysm can be measured on CE - MRA images accurately, compared with conventional DSA , there was no statistical difference. CE - MRA was superior to DSA in displaying the thrombus inside aneurysms. Conclusion: CE - MRA is a fast, noninvasive and efficient technique for diagnosing intracranial aneurysms. Its 3D information is helpful for treatment planning.
出处 《中国医学计算机成像杂志》 CSCD 2008年第4期341-345,共5页 Chinese Computed Medical Imaging
关键词 颊内动脉瘤 磁共振血管造影术 Intracranial aneurysm Magnetic resonance angiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献32

  • 1韩鸿宾,沙琳,刘洪东,张树墩,刘溢,边杰,董志.MR快速多时相造影增强与时间飞跃血管成像在颈部血管疾病中诊断价值的对比研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(7):737-741. 被引量:17
  • 2张宗军,许健,李苏健,陈君坤.磁共振血管造影在脑动脉瘤诊断中的应用价值[J].中华放射学杂志,1996,30(2):139-141. 被引量:8
  • 3Luccichenti G,Cademartiri F,Lucidi V,et al.MR Angiography of the Carotid Arteries:Parameters Affecting Image Quality [J].Acad Radiol,2003,10(5):520-526.
  • 4Huston J,Fain SB,Wald JT,et al.Carotid Artery:Elliptic Centric Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Compared with Conven tional Angiography[J].Radiology,2001,218(1):138-143.
  • 5Willinek WA,Gieseke J,Conrad R,et al.Randomly Segmented Central k-Space Ordering in High Spatial-Resolution Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Supraaortic Arteries:Initial Experience[J].Radiology,2002,225 (2):583-588.
  • 6Wutke R,Lang W,Fellner C,et al.High Resolution,Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Elliptical Centric K-Space Ordering of Supra-Aortic Arteries Compared with Selective X-Ray Angiography[J].Stroke,2002,33(6):1522-1529.
  • 7Marco JK,Schonfeld S,Keller I,et al.Contrast Enhanced Carotid MR Angiography with Commercially Available Triggering Mechanisms and Elliptic Centric Phase Encoding[J].AJR,2001,176(1):211-227.
  • 8Wardlaw JM,Lewis SC,Coillie DA,et al.Interobserver Variability of Magnetic Resonance Angiography in the Diagnosis of Carotid Stenosis:Effect of Observer Experience [J].Neuroradiology,2002,44(2):126-132.
  • 9Lee VS,Martin DJ,Krinsky GA,et al.Gadiolinium-enhanced MR angiography:artifacts and piffalls.A JR,2000,175:197~200.
  • 10Poon E,Yucel EK,Pagan-Marin H,et al.Lliac artery stenosis measurements:comparison of two-flight and three-dimensional dynamic gadolinium enhanced MR angiography.A JR,1997,167:1137~1144.

共引文献56

同被引文献55

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部