期刊文献+

莫西沙星与左氧氟沙星静脉滴注治疗老年吸入性肺炎80例对比研究 被引量:1

Comparative study on moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin in the treatment of aspiration pneumonitis of eighty old patients
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:观察莫西沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗老年吸入性肺炎的临床疗效和安全性。方法:随机选择老年吸入性肺炎住院患者80例,分为治疗组和对照组,每组40例。治疗组使用莫西沙星400 mg静脉滴注给药,每日1次,对照组使用左氧氟沙星500 mg,静脉滴注给药,每日1次,共治疗7 d,观察2组疗效及不良反应。结果:治疗组和对照组的临床有效率分别为90.0%和82.5%,细菌清除率分别为94.3%和96.4%,不良反应发生率分别为15.0%和17.5%,2组各项指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:莫西沙星针剂治疗吸入性肺炎疗效较佳,且安全有效。 Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin vs levofloxacin in the treatment of aspiration pneumonitis. Method: Forty cases with aspiration pneumonitis were enrolled as treatment group which was treated with moxifloxacin (400 mg iv qd for 7 d) and other 40 cases as control group with levo- floxacin (500 mg iv qd for 7 d). Results: Results indicated that the total clinical effective rates of the treatment group and control group were 90% and 82. 50%, and the bacterial eradicanon rates 94. 29% and 96. 420% and the adverse effect rates 15% and 20%, respectively. No significant difference of the above figures between the two groups were found (P〉0.05 ). Conclusion: Moxifloxacin was effective and safe in the treatment of aspiration pneumonitis.
作者 孙勉 刘北林
出处 《新疆医科大学学报》 CAS 2008年第7期824-825,共2页 Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
关键词 莫西沙星 左氧氟沙星 吸入性肺炎 moxifloxacin levofloxacin aspiration pneumonitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1李仲兴 郑家齐.诊断细菌学[M].香港:黄河文化出版社,1992.295-297.
  • 2Brueggemann A B, Kugler K C, Doern G V. In vitro activity of Bay 12-8039, a novel 8-methoxyquinolone,compared to activities of six fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae , Haemophilus influenzae , and Moraxella catarrhalis [J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1997,41 (7): 1594
  • 3Holt J G, Krieg N R, Sneath P A. Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology [M]. 9th ed., Baltimore:Williams & Wilkins, 1994: 532
  • 4Carvalno M G S, Teixeira M L, Facklam. Use of test for acidification of methyl-α-D-glucopyranoside of Enterococcus and susceptibility to efrotomycin for differentiation of strains of Enterococcus and some related genera [J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1998,36 (6): 1584
  • 5Balows A. Manual of clinical microbiology [M]. 5th ed.Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology,1991:1105
  • 6Bauernfeind A. Comparison of the antibacterial activities of the quinolones Bay 12-8039, gatifloxacin (AM 1155),trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin [J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 1997,40: 639
  • 7Woodcock J M, Andrews J M, Boswell F J, et al. In vitro activity of Bay 12-8039, a new fluoroquinolone [J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1997,41 ( 1 ): 101
  • 8Fass R J. In vitro activity of Bay 12-8039, a new 8-methoxyquinolone [J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1997,41(8) :1818
  • 9Hoogkamp-Korstanje J A A, Roelofs-Willemse J. Comparative in vitro activity of moxifloxacin against Grampositive clinical isolates [J]. J Antimicrob Chemother,2000,45:31
  • 10French G L, Enterococci and vancomycin resistance [J].Clin Infect Dis, 1998,27(Suppl 1) :S75

共引文献11

同被引文献26

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部