摘要
目的探讨宫颈电环切除术（LEEP）和宫颈微波术对慢性宫颈炎疗效，以寻求更好的治疗方法。方法采用宫颈LEEP术和宫颈微波术对168例慢性宫颈炎患者进行治疗，对两种治疗方法进行比较。结果宫颈LEEP术治愈率96．2％（74／78），宫颈微波术治愈率84．4％（76／90）。两种方法治愈率比较，P〈0．05。而且LEEP不影响病理诊断，对宫颈病变能起到诊断与治疗的双重功效。两组患者于术后1～2周阴道开始出血，持续3～16天。大多数患者术后阴道分泌物增多，持续4～18天。两纽比较，P〉0．05。结论两种治疗方法疗效有明显差异，但不良反应无显著性差异。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficiency of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and microwave on chronic cervicitis, To explore the better treatment, Methods The 168 cases were treated by loop elec- trosurgical excision procedure or microwave. The individual efficiency and after treatment were recorded and com- pared. Results The cured rate of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure was 96.2% （74/78）, the cured rate of the microwave was 84.4% （76/90）. There was obvious difference about the cured rate between the two methods,p 〈 0.05. And LEEP had no influence on pathological diagnosis. It diagnosed cervical disease as well as curing it. All of the two groups＇ patients bleed lasting 3 ~ 16 days after the treatment 1 ~ 2 weeks. Most of the patients occurred the leucorrhea discharge that lasted 4-18 days. The two results were compared,p 〉 0. 05, Conclusion The effciencies between two methods had obvious difference, But the side effects had no difference.
出处
《现代医院》
2008年第9期48-49,共2页
Modern Hospitals
关键词
宫颈糜烂
LEEP治疗
微波治疗
Chronic cervicitis, LEEP treatment, Microwave treatment
