期刊文献+

认知负荷对顿悟问题解决的影响 被引量:6

A Research on the Influence of Cognitive Loads on Insight Problem Solving
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 顿悟问题解决有许多影响因素,其中认知资源的耗费会影响到工作记忆的容量及加工效果,进而影响顿悟问题解决的效果。本实验通过三种呈现时间间隔,两种活动任务(高负荷任务和低负荷任务),组合为五种实验条件,探讨了源问题与靶问题呈现时间间隔与间隔期间活动任务(即不同的认知资源耗费程度)对关键启发信息激活的影响。结果表明:认知资源的耗费是影响顿悟问题解决的重要因素,认知资源耗费越多,关键启发信息越难激活;如果没有其他信息的干扰,源靶问题之间的时间间隔越长,有助于被试对源问题中的关键启发信息的思考与归纳,进而在解答靶问题过程中就越容易提取出关键启发信息。 Among the many factors which influence insight problem solving, the waste of cognitive resources will influence the capacity and processing effects of working memory, and then insight problem solving . The experiment combined three types of presentational interval with two levels of activity task(high load task and low load task) to have five experimental conditions. From two factors, i.e., the presentational interval, betwee the base problem and the target problem and activity during the interval, it probed the influence of varying waste levels of cognitive resources on the activation of key heuristic information. The results show that the waste of cognitive resources is an important influential factor in insight problem solving, and the more cognitive resourees waste, the more difficult to activate key heuristic information. The results also indicate that if there is no other impending information, longer interval between the base problem and the target problem will contribute to the consideration and summation of key heuristic information on the base problem, and will make it easier to draw out key heuristic information during the target problem resolving.
作者 邢强 黄伟东
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期981-983,共3页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 广东省哲学社会科学十一五规划项目资助(07SXQ002)
关键词 认知负荷 顿悟 关键启发信息 激活 cognitive loads, insight, key heuristic information, activation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Mayer R E. The search of insight: grappling with Gestalt psychology's unnswered questions. In R J Sternberg ,J E Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. 1995 : 33 - 62.
  • 2Knoblich G,Ohlsson S,Haider H,Rhenius D. Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1999, 25:1534 - 1556.
  • 3MacGregor J N, Ormerod T C, Chronicle E P. Information processing and In.sight: A process model of performance on the nine -dot problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognltion, 2001,27 ( 1 ) : 176 - 201.
  • 4Orrnerod T C, Macgregror J N, Chronide E P. Dynamics and constraints in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, Memory and Cognition, 2002,28 ( 4 ) : 791 - 799.
  • 5Laura R Novick, Steven J Sherman. On the nature of insight solutions: Evidence from skill differences in anagram solution. Journal of Experimental Psychology,2003,56(2) :351 - 382.
  • 6Edward P Chronicle, James N MacGregor and Thomas C Ormerod . What Makes an Insight Problem? The Roles of Heuristics, Goal Conception, and Solution Recoding in Knowledge- Lean Problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2004 30,(1): 14-27.
  • 7Kershaw T C, Ohlsson S. Multiple cause of difficulty in insight: the ease of the nine - dot problem. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2004. 30(1): 3 -13.
  • 8Finite R A. Creative insight and preinventive forms. In R J Steinberg , J E Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. 1995: 255- 280.
  • 9Davidson J E. The suddenness of insight. In R J Sternberg , J E Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. 1995:125-155.
  • 10张庆林,邱江,曹贵康.顿悟认知机制的研究述评与理论构想[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1435-1437. 被引量:109

二级参考文献27

  • 1许远理,李亦菲,朱新明.评价问题难度的一种新方法──认知负荷测量模型[J].心理科学进展,1998,8(2):7-11. 被引量:8
  • 2张庆林,肖崇好.顿悟与问题表征的转变[J].心理学报,1996,28(1):30-37. 被引量:25
  • 3Martindale C Personality, situation, and creativity. In: J Glover, R Ronning, & C R Reynolds (Eds.). Handbook of creativity. New York, 1989: 211 - 232.
  • 4Katz, A N. Creativity and individual differences in asymmetrical cerebral hemispheric functioning. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 1983,1:3- 16.
  • 5Dimond S, Beaumont J G. Experimental of studies of the hemisphere function in the human brain. In: S Dimond & Beaumont J G. (Eds.). Hemisphere function in the human brains. NY: Halsted, 1974:48 - 88.
  • 6Martindale C, Hasenfus N. EEG differences as a function of creativity, stages of the creative process, and effort to be original. Biological Psychology, 1978, (6) : 157 - 167.
  • 7Eysenck, H. Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • 8Kaplan C A, Simon H A. In: Search of Insight. Cognitive Psychology , 1990,22 : 374 - 419.
  • 9Knoblieh G, Ohlsson S. Constraint Relaxation and Chunk Decomposition in Insight Problem Solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1999, 25(6):1534- 1555.
  • 10Weisberg R W, Alba J W. An examination of the alleged role of "fixation" in the solution of several "insight" problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1981,110 : 169 - 192.

共引文献132

同被引文献121

引证文献6

二级引证文献379

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部