期刊文献+

语篇连贯的认知基础:整体性识解 被引量:14

Cognitive Basis of Discourse Coherence:A Holistic Construal
原文传递
导出
摘要 语篇具有可理解性的前提是连贯性。本文提出语篇的整体性识解假说,认为连贯性是听话人整体性识解的结果。整体性识解是语篇连贯的论证过程,其方法是对语篇中的不定指称表达式进行赋值(指称求解),同时识别语篇间的意义关系(语篇关系),指导原则是将语篇识解为最佳连贯的语篇。会话含意是整体性识解过程的中间产物。 Discussion coherence is a prerequisite of comprehensible discourse. The present paper offers the hypothesis that discourse coherence results from the audience' s holistic construal of the discourse. The holistic construal is the default process of the audience when approaching a discourse. This approach is characteristic of two cognitive processes: one is responsible for indefinite reference solution and the other for identifying the discourse relation connecting sub-discourses on the basis of the argument for the optimal discourse coherence. Conversational implicature is viewed as a by-product of the holistic construal.
作者 何爱晶
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期44-49,共6页 Foreign Language Research
关键词 指称求解 篇章连贯 整体性识解 形式语用学 reference solution discourse coherence holistic construal formal pragmatics
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1王寅.语篇连贯的认知世界分析方法——体验哲学和认知语言学对语篇连贯性的解释[J].外语学刊,2005(4):16-23. 被引量:111
  • 2Clark,H.H.& Haviland,S.E.Comprehension and the Given-new Contract[A].In R.Freedle (ed.).Dis-course Comprehension and Production[C].Norwood,NJ:Ablex,1977.
  • 3Clark,H.H.Bridging[A].In Johnson-Laird,P.N.& Wason,P.C.(eds.).Thinking:Readings in Cogni-tive Science[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1977a.
  • 4Clark,H.H.Inference in Comprehension[A].In Laberge,D.& Samuels,S.(eds.).Basic Processes in Brea-ding:Perception and Comprehension[C].Cambridge university Press,1977b.
  • 5Erku,F.& Gundel,J.Indirect Ananphors[A].In J.Ver-schueren & M.Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.).The Pragmat-ics Perspective[C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,1987.
  • 6Halliday,M.A.K.& Hassan,R.Cohesion in English[M].London:Longman,1976.
  • 7Hobbs,J.R.Resolving Pronoun References[J].Lingua,1978(44).
  • 8Hoey.M.Patterns of Lexis in Text[M].Oxford University Press,1991.
  • 9Mann,W.& Thompson,S.Rhetorical Structure Theory:Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization[J].Text,1988(8).
  • 10Matsui,T.Bridging and Relevance[M].Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company,2000.

二级参考文献25

  • 1陈平.汉语零形回指的话语分析[J].中国语文,1987,(5):363-378.
  • 2马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿[A]..马克思恩格斯全集:第42卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1979..
  • 3朱永生.语言·语篇·语境[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1993..
  • 4Brown, G. & Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis[M]. CUP.
  • 5Cook, Guy. 1994. Discourse and Literature[M]. OUP.
  • 6Deane, P. 1992. Grammar in Mind and Brain: Explorations in Cognitive Syntax[M]. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 7Emmott, C. 1999. Embodied in a Constructed World: Narrative Processing, Knowledge Representation, and Indirect Anaphora[ A]. In Hoek K. V., A. A. Kibrik & L. Noordman (eds.). Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics[ C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 8Enkvist, N. E. 1978. Coherence, Pseudo- coherence, and Non- coherence[A]. In ? stman J.- O.(ed.) Cohesion and Semantics. ? bo, Finland:? bo Akademi Foundation.
  • 9Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan. R. 1976. Cohesion in English[M]. London: Longman.
  • 10Hallidan, M. A. K. & Hasan. R. 1985. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language as a Social- semiotic Perspective[M].OUP.

共引文献110

同被引文献103

引证文献14

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部