期刊文献+

不同上颌窦底形态冲顶对冲顶器、窦底骨质及黏膜应力和位移影响的三维有限元分析 被引量:18

Effect of different configurations of maxillary sinus floor on the stress and displacement of bone condenser, bone and mucosa of maxillary sinus during internal sinus floor elevation:Three-dimensional finite element analysis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 背景:上颌窦内提升术往往在盲视下操作,很难判断上颌窦黏膜的完整性,也不清楚上颌窦底形态是否会影响上颌窦内提升窦底冲顶过程。目的:通过建立不同上颌窦底形态的上颌窦区域及冲顶器的三维有限元模型,了解窦底形态对上颌窦内提升术窦底提升安全性与效率的影响。对象:男性志愿者1名,45岁,全口牙列完整,牙周组织健康,上颌窦底形态为浅凹形。采用16排螺旋CT获取数据重建三维有限元模型。设计、时间及地点:重复观察测量,于2007-05/10在上海大学快速制造中心完成。方法:利用逆向工程建立了浅凹形、深凹形和凸形窦底形态的上颌窦区域三维有限元模型。模拟上颌窦内提升手术,在窦底部位施加动态冲击载荷进行窦底提升。主要观察指标:分析窦底冲顶时冲顶器、窦底骨质及黏膜的应力和位移情况。结果:深凹形的上颌窦底进行提升时效率最高、风险较小,而凸形上颌窦底形态应力分散的作用较强,提升效率最低,而且黏膜上张力增加,不利于上颌窦底的提升。结论:三种不同的上颌窦底形态中,凹形上颌窦底提升时黏膜上张力增加对内提升术有着不利的影响,凸形上颌窦底提升效率最低。 BACKGROUND: Internal sinus floor elevation is always performed blindly, so it is difficult to identify the integrity of maxillary sinus mucosa, or whether the appearance of sinus floor may influence the surgery process. OBJECTIVE: To establish 3D finite element model of maxillary sinus and bone condenser, and to investigate the influence of different configurations of maxillary sinus floor on the security and efficiency during internal sinus floor elevation. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: Repetitive observation and measurements were performed at Rapid Prototyping Center of Shanghai University from May to October 2007. PARTICIPANT: One 45-year-old male volunteer with intact dentition, healthy dental capsule, and dimple maxillary sinus floor. Sixteen-lead spiral CT was used to acquire the data for reconstruction of 3D finite element models. METHODS: 3D finite element models of maxillary sinus with shallow concave floor, deep concave floor and convex floor were created by reverse engineering software. The operation of internal sinus floor elevation was simulated by accomplishing the dynamic loading process of osteotome technique under different configurations of maxillary sinus floor conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The stress and displacement of bone condenser, bone and mucosa of maxillary sinus. RESULTS: The deep concave floor of sinus showed the highest elevation efficiency and minimal risk of perforation of maxillary sinus mucosa. The convex floor of sinus showed lowest elevation efficiency with higher stress dissipation. In addition, the increased tension on the mucosa was not beneficial to the elevation. CONCLUSION: Of the three configurations of maxillary sinus floor, the convex floor of sinus increases tension on the mucosa, which is not beneficial to the internal sinus floor elevation, and the convex floor of sinus shows the lowest elevation efficiency.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第17期3252-3256,共5页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, et al. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21(2):290-297
  • 2王淑英,张振庭,白保晶,蒋向华,王延荣.铸造三臂卡环固位臂动态应力分析方法的探讨[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2005,6(2):124-126. 被引量:2
  • 3Alhag M, Renvert S, Polyzois I,et al. Re-osseointegration on rough implant surfaces previously coated with bacterial biofilm: an experimental study in the dog . Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19(2):182-187
  • 4Abarca M, Van Steenberghe D, Malevez C,et al. The neurophysiology of osseointegrated oral implants. A clinically underestimated aspect. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33(3):161-169
  • 5Lin CL, Chang SH, Chang WJ, et al. Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a single tooth implant placed in the maxilla using finite element analysis and the statistics-based Taguchi method. Eur J Oral Sci 2007;115(5):408-416
  • 6Mish CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 3rd edition. St Louis, 2008,Mosby
  • 7Schwartz Z, Goldstein M, Raviv E,et al. Clinical evaluation of demineralized bone allograft in a hyaluronic acid carrier for sinus lift augmentation in humans: a computed tomography and histomorphometric study . Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(2):204-211
  • 8Draenert GF, Eisenmenger W. A new technique for the transcrestal sinus floor elevation and alveolar ridge augmentation with press-fit bone cylinders: a technical note. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007;35(4-5):201-206
  • 9兰晶,徐欣,高振南,霍丽德,梁晋.2种上颌窦提升术在牙种植中的应用[J].上海口腔医学,2005,14(5):540-542. 被引量:6
  • 10Hernández-Alfaro F, Torradeflot MM, Marti C.Prevalence and management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus-lift procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19(1):91-98

二级参考文献55

  • 1冯耀光,吴忠仕,胡建国,胡铁辉,张竟超,徐朝军,王晖,马忠夏.光氧化反应处理牛颈静脉带瓣管道的形态学与理化性能研究[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2004,29(4):429-431. 被引量:13
  • 2冷晔,丁祖泉,龚璐璐.小肠黏膜下基质弹性模量的测定[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2006,20(3):292-294. 被引量:4
  • 3Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants:A review and proposed criteria of success[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,1986,1:11-25.
  • 4Howard BK, Rohrieh RJ. J Hast Reconstruct Surg, 2002,109 (3) : 1128-1146.
  • 5Bravetti P, Membre H, Marchal L, et al. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1998, 56 (10):1170-1177.
  • 6Peleg M, Chaushu G, Mazor Z, et al. J Pefiodontol, 1999,70 (12) : 1564-1573.
  • 7Timmenga NM, Raghoebar GM, Boefing G, et al. J Oral Maxillfac Surg, 1997,55:936-939.
  • 8Velasquez-Plata D, Hovey LR, Peach CC, et al. Int JOral Maxillofac Implants, 2002, 17 (6) :854-860.
  • 9Krennmair G, Ulm GW, Lugrnayr H, et al. J Oral Maxillofac Sttrg, 1999, 57:667-671.
  • 10Van den Bergh JPA, Ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJM,et al. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2000, 11:256-265.

共引文献21

同被引文献151

引证文献18

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部