期刊文献+

非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征诊疗策略的变化与评估 被引量:2

Comparison of the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Non-ST elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome between 2000 and 2006 in a Teaching Hospital.
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较2000年和2006年非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征患者的诊疗策略变化,比较与指南的差距。方法回顾性调查分析547例患者。结果2006年心肌损伤标记物、胸片、心超、动态心电图、运动平板等检查和冠脉造影率比2000年增高,而负荷核素心肌显像、CT冠状动脉成像检查率降低;2006年比2000年阿司匹林、阿司匹林负荷量、β-受体阻滞剂、ACEI、噻吩并吡啶类化合物、GPⅡb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂、他汀类使用率和有创干预率均高,而吗啡、硝酸酯类和普通肝素使用率降低。结论非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征患者诊疗策略进步明显,尤其是有创检查及治疗;但临床实践与循证指南仍存在差距,特别是β-受体阻滞剂使用及加量、GPⅡb/Ⅲa抑制剂和低分子肝素使用,需进一步提高循证指南的宣传教育。 Objective To compare the diagnosis and management of patients with Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome between 2000 and 2006, scale the gap between practice and guidelines. Methods Clinical data of 547 inpatients were retrospectively analyzed. Results Elevated cardiac markers, chest X-Ray, echocardiography, dynamic electrocardiogram,exercise ECG, coronary angiography were used more in 2006 than those in 2000, but the usage of cardiac stress imaging and electron-beam computed tomography was lower. Significant increases in the use of aspirin( P 〈 0.01 ), using 300mg first dosage of aspirin( P 〈 0.01 ), β-blocker( P 〈 0.01 ), ACEI( P 〈 0.01 ), thienopyridine( P 〈 0.01 ), GP Ⅱ b/Ⅲ a inhibitor( P 〈 0.01 ), statins( P 〈 0.01 ) and invasive strate- gies( P 〈 0.01 ) were found between 2006 and 2000. The utilization rate of morphine sulfate, nitrates, unfractionated heparin were lower. Conlusions There were great progress in the diagnosis and management of patients with Non-ST elevation acute coronary syn- drome between, n 2000 and 2006. Still, further improvements are needed for optimal implementation of these guidelines such as the use of β-blocker, adding dosage of β-blocker, GP Ⅱ b/Ⅲ a inhibitor, low-molecular-weight heparin.
出处 《心脑血管病防治》 2008年第2期88-90,共3页 CARDIO-CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT
关键词 非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征 不稳定性心绞痛 非ST段抬高型心肌梗死 治疗学 Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome Unstable angina Non-ST segment Elevated Myocardial Therapeutics Benchmarking
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA guideline for the management of Patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American college of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Commttee on the Management of Patients with Unstable angina)[J]. J Am Coll Cardil, 2000,36:970- 1062.
  • 2Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of Patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Summary Article. A report of the American college of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Unstable angina) [J]. Circulatuion, 2002,106:1893 - 1900.
  • 3Bertrand ME, Simoons ML, FOX KAA, et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes: acute coronary syndromes without Persistent ST segment elevation. Recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology[J]. Eur heart J, 2000,21:1406- 1432.
  • 4中华医学会心血管病学分会 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会 中国循环杂志编辑委员会.不稳定性心绞痛诊断和治疗建议.中国循环杂志,2001,16(03):227-229.
  • 5Antman EM, Cohen M, Bemink PJ, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for Prognostication and therapeutic decision making[J]. JAMA, 2000,284:835 - 42.
  • 6Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in Patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitor tirofiban[J]. N Engl J Med, 2001,344:1879- 1887.
  • 7Carmthers KF, Dabbous OH, Flather MD, et al. GRACE Investigators. Contemporary management of acute coronary syndromes: does the Practice match the evidence? The global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) [J]. Heart, 2005, 91(3):290-298.
  • 8中国急性冠状动脉综合征多中心临床研究协作组.中国多省市急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者治疗现状与指南差距分析[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(9):789-792. 被引量:47

二级参考文献6

  • 1Fox KA, Goodman SG, Anderson FA, et al. From guidelines to clinical practice: the impact of hospital and geographical characteristics on temporal trends in the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J, 2003,24: 1414-1424.
  • 2Eagle KA, Goodman SG, Avezum A, et al. Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction - findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Lancet, 2002,359 : 373-377.
  • 3Ryan TJ, Antman EM, Brokks NH, et al. For the committee on management of acute myocardial infarction. 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999,34: 890-911.
  • 4The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Acute myocardial infarction: pre-hospital and in-hospital management. Eur Heart J, 1996, 17:43 -63.
  • 5Granger C, Sendon JL, Van de Weft F, et al. Applying the evidence in acute coronary syndromes: a report card from the global registry of acute coronary events. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001,37 (Suppl A):503A.
  • 6高润霖.急性心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2001,29(12):710-725. 被引量:5257

共引文献72

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部