摘要
采用结论评估范式,通过考察不同类型三段论推理中信念偏差效应的表现形式,比较了选择性检查模型、必然性误解模型和心理模型理论对三段论推理中信念偏差效应的预测,对各种理论的解释力进行了验证。研究结果表明,心理模型理论能够包容较多的实验现象,并对信念影响推理的信息加工过程进行了较为具体的说明,因而较其它理论而言显示出一定的优越性。
Using the syllogism evaluation task to examine the patterns of the belief bias effect in syllogistic reasoning, this research compared the predictions of the Selective Scrutiny Model, the Misinterpreted Necessity Model and the mental model theory, and tested the explanatory power of these models about the belief bias. The results were that the mental model theory could predict more experimental phenomena than the other two models, and especially, give the specific interpretation about the mechanism of belief affecting reasoning, so the mental model theory showed its superiority in theories about the belief bias effect.
出处
《心理科学》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2008年第2期389-391,400,共4页
Journal of Psychological Science
关键词
三段论推理
信念偏差效应
心理模型理论
syllogism reasoning, the belief bias effect .mental model theory
