4Baker LH. Breast cancer detection demonstration project : five - year summary report[J], Cancer J Clin,1982,32(4) :194 -225.
5Baines CJ, Miller AB, Wall C, et al. Sensitivity and specificit of firsts creen mammography in the Canadian national breasts creening study : apreliminary report from five centres [ J ]. Radiology, 1986,160 : 295 - 298.
3Buadu LD, Murakami J, Marayama S, et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopaphologic findings and tumor angoigenesis. Radiology, 1996,200:639-649.
4Hulka CA, Edmister WB, Smith BL, et al. Dynamic echo-planar imaging of the breast: experience in diagnosing breast carcinoma and and correlation with tumor angoigenesis. Radiology, 1997,205: 837-842.
5Kinkel K, Hylton MN. Challenges to interpretation of breast MRI.J Magn Reson Imaging,2001,13:821-829.
6Malur S,Wurdinger S, Moriz A, et al. Comparision of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Res, 20
7Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitiation off resonance: clinical experience with pathological correlation. Radiology, 1993,187:493-501.
8Moon WK,Myung JS,Lee YJ,et al.US of ductal carcinoma in situ.RadioGraphics,2002,22(2):269-281.
9Zonderland HM,Coerkamp EG,Hermans J,et al.Diagnosis of breast cancer:contribution of US as an adjuvent to mammography.Radiology,1999,213:413-422.
5[1]Singletary SE,Allred C,Ashley P,et al.Revision of the Amer-ican joint Committce cancer staging system for breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2002,20(16):3628-3636.
6[3]sick lee EA Breast Imaging From 1965 to the present[J].Ra-diology,2000,215(1):1-16.
