期刊文献+

超临界机组锅炉稳压法与降压法蒸汽吹洗的比较 被引量:8

COMPARISON OF PRESSURE-STABILIZING METHOD AND PRESSURE-REDUCING METHOD FOR STEAM BLOWING BOILER OF SUPERCRITICAL UNITS
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 介绍了在华能太仓发电有限责任公司超临界机组4号锅炉调试中采用稳压和不熄火降压方式蒸汽吹洗的情况。吹洗结果表明,4号锅炉无论采用稳压或不熄火降压方式吹洗,均能保证要求的吹管系数及吹洗质量。不熄火降压方式吹洗的效果优于稳压法,且省时、省燃料、省除盐水、操作简化。 The situation of steam blowing by using pressure- stabilizing method and pressure- reducing method under condition without putting out the fire in debugging process of boiler no. 4 for supercritical unit in Huaneng Taicang Power Generation Co Ltd has been presented. Practice in blowing shows that the required pipe - blowing coefficient and Mowing quality can be ensured no matter what method is used for steam blowing, however, the effectiveness of pressure - reducing method under condition without putting out the fire is superior than that of pressure- stabilizing method, saving time, fuel, and desalting water, and being simple in operation.
出处 《热力发电》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第1期72-74,共3页 Thermal Power Generation
关键词 超临界机组 锅炉 稳压法 降压法 蒸汽吹洗 吹管系数 supercritical unit : boiler pressure - stabilizing method pressure - reducing methed steam blowing pipe - blowing coefficicnt
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献4

同被引文献39

引证文献8

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部