大学英语教学中的形成性评价略论被引量：13

Brief Introduction Formative Assessment in College English Teaching and Learning

下载PDF

导出

摘要在现行的大学英语教学评价体系中,片面强调教学结果的终结性评价存在诸多负面影响,而注重学习过程评价的形成性评价有利于提高学生的自主学习能力和英语综合应用能力,促进学生全面发展。本文在介绍形成性评价基本理论基础上,提出了在大学英语教学中应用形成性评价的原则和具体做法,并总结了需要注意的若干问题。 In the present assessment system in College English teaching and learning,summative assessment that unilaterally emphasizes the result has many side-effects ,however, formative assessment that lays emphasis on the process of learning is profitable to enhance students＇ ability of autonomous learning and the comprehensive application of English, and promote the overall development of students. The paper puts forward the application principles of formative assessment and the methods on how to use it, then summarize the problems need to be noticed.

作者谢娜

机构地区安徽师范大学外国语学院

出处《阜阳师范学院学报（社会科学版）》 2007年第6期120-122,共3页 Journal of Fuyang Normal University：Social Science Edition

基金教育部第二批大学英语教学改革扩展项目"利用形成性评价促进非英语专业学生自主性英语学习能力的培养"的阶段性成果

关键词形成性评价终结性评价大学英语教学评价 formative assessment , summative assessment , educational assessment of College English

分类号 G642 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献13

1[1]Airasian,P Classroom Assessment.New York:McGraw-Hill,1991.
2[2]Arthur Hughes.Testing for Language Teachers.Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2002.
3[3]Black,P.& William,D.Assessment and classroom learning[J].Assessment in Education,1998a,5(1):7-74.
4[4]Oosterhof,A.2003.Developing and Using Classroom Assessments (3rd Ed)[M].New Jersey:Merrill Prentice Hall.
5[5]Stiggins,R.J.Assessment crisis:The absence of assessment for learning[J].Phi Delta Kappan,2002,83 (10):758-765.
6[6]Swearingen,R.(2002).A primer:Diagnostic,formative and summative assessment Available from htpp://www.mmrwsjr,com/assessment.htm..
7[7]教育部.大学英语课程教学要求(试行)[N].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2004.
8[9]罗少茜.英语课堂教学形成性评价研究[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2001.
9北京师范大学外语系课题组.对现行外语教学评价体制的反思[J].中小学外语教学,2001,(6).
10郭茜,杨志强.试论形成性评价及其对大学英语教学与测试的启示[J].清华大学教育研究,2003,24(5):103-108. 被引量：355

二级参考文献33

1束定芳,王惠东.外语课堂教学功能的重新思考与定位[J].外语与外语教学,2004(8):19-21. 被引量：146
2Genesee F & Upshur J A. Classroom-based evaluation in second language education[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1996.
3Hamp-Lyons L & Condon W. Assessing the portfolio: Principles for practice, theory & research[M].Mount Waverly: Hampton Press, Inc , 2000.
4Hein G & Price S. Active assessment for active science[M]. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1994.
5National Council oF Teachers oF Mathematics. Assessment standards For school mathematics [M]. Reston,VA: NCTM, 1995.
6National Research Council. Classroom assessment and the National Science Education Standards [M].Committee on Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards. J M Atkin, P Black, J Coffey (eds.). Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.Washington, DC: National Academy press, 2001.
7Rassi j A. Rational for formative assessment component in new audiology certification standards. 1999.Retrieved March 30, 2003, from http://professional, asha. org/academic/Rassi Formative Assess. cfm.
8Sadler, D. R. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems[J]. Instructional Science, 1989,18(2): 119--144.
9Simpson M. Developing differentiation practices: Meeting the needs of teachers and pupils [J]. The Curricuium Journal, 1997, 8(1) : 85 -- 104.
10Simpson M. Diagnostic and formative assessment in the Scottish classroom[A]. In T G K Bryce and W.M. Humes (eds.) Scottish Education[M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.