摘要
目的：对复合体Dyract AP与光固化玻璃离子水门汀3M-Vitremer修复楔状缺损的临床效果进行比较。方法：55例390颗楔状缺损牙分别用复合体Dyract AP（A组）与光固化玻璃离子水门汀（Vitremer,美国3M公司）（B组）修复,于修复后1.5-2年复查。结果：A组成功率94.68%,B组88.12%,两组差异有统计学意义。结论：两种材料均为临床修复楔状缺损的较理想材料,Dyract AP临床效果优于3M-Vitrem-er。
Objective：To evaluate the curative effect of restoring wedge- shaped defects by Dyract AP and 3M- Vitremer. Methods： 55 cases of 390 teeth with dental wedge- shaped defects were randomly divided into two groups- one group restored by Dymct AP（ group Ⅰ ） ,the other by 3M- Vitremer （group Ⅱ ）. Remits： The successful rate was 94.68 % in group Ⅰ , 88.12 % in group Ⅱ for 1.5 to 2 years. Conclusion： Dyract AP is superior to 3 M - vitreme when they ave used to restore wedge- shaped defects.
出处
《中国民康医学》
2007年第14期526-526,531,共2页
Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词
牙科材料
楔状缺损
临床疗效
Dyract AP
3M- vitrewer
wedge- shaped defect
